The United States is making much slower progress than expected in establishing a Bitcoin strategic reserve. Patrick Witt, director of the White House Cryptocurrency Committee, recently revealed that the project is indeed still moving forward but is stuck on some seemingly minor yet actually tricky legal provisions. Interdepartmental coordination has also been less smooth.
Currently, departments such as the Department of Justice and the Office of Legal Counsel are involved, discussing relevant legal frameworks and regulatory issues. In simple terms, it’s about clarifying how Bitcoin can legally establish itself as a national reserve asset. This matter remains on the government’s priority agenda, indicating that the US is taking it seriously.
From the overall pace of progress, it’s clear that the US doesn’t find it easy to complete this step. The intertwined legal details, departmental coordination, and regulatory frameworks require repeated communication among various parties to sort out the issues. However, since it has already been included in the priority list, it shows that this is not a project that will be shelved. There may be new developments in this area in the coming months.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 15h ago
It's been two years already, and you're still dithering. When will this legal framework be established, in the Year of the Monkey or the Year of the Horse?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFreedom
· 15h ago
Once again, legal clauses are stuck, and the American bureaucratic system is really a hassle.
On one side, they are calling for Bitcoin reserves, while the legal department is still entangled in details, a typical case of left hand fighting right hand.
Why has the legal framework been stalled for so long? Haven't the asset attributes of Bitcoin been clarified yet?
It's on the priority list, which means they haven't given up, but the efficiency is worrying.
Bitcoin strategic reserves sound simple, but in practice, it's full of pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
InscriptionGriller
· 15h ago
Haha, even the US hits a snag sometimes. Legal frameworks are even harder to fix than code vulnerabilities.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreather
· 15h ago
The legal framework is really a drag; if it were before, it would have been done long ago.
It's another case of departments passing the buck. The efficiency of the U.S. government is truly remarkable, haha.
If it's on the priority agenda, it means the issue is not small. Let's take it slow; anyway, we can wait.
This thing definitely has timing issues, but in the end, it still has to go through.
The United States is making much slower progress than expected in establishing a Bitcoin strategic reserve. Patrick Witt, director of the White House Cryptocurrency Committee, recently revealed that the project is indeed still moving forward but is stuck on some seemingly minor yet actually tricky legal provisions. Interdepartmental coordination has also been less smooth.
Currently, departments such as the Department of Justice and the Office of Legal Counsel are involved, discussing relevant legal frameworks and regulatory issues. In simple terms, it’s about clarifying how Bitcoin can legally establish itself as a national reserve asset. This matter remains on the government’s priority agenda, indicating that the US is taking it seriously.
From the overall pace of progress, it’s clear that the US doesn’t find it easy to complete this step. The intertwined legal details, departmental coordination, and regulatory frameworks require repeated communication among various parties to sort out the issues. However, since it has already been included in the priority list, it shows that this is not a project that will be shelved. There may be new developments in this area in the coming months.