The prediction market sector has been quite lively recently. Following Polymarket's controversy over insider trading in Venezuela, its competitor Kalshi's CEO Tarek Mansour has also come forward to make a statement.



On January 8th, Mansour posted on LinkedIn supporting a legislative proposal introduced by New York State Democratic Congressman Ritchie Torres. The core goal of this legislation is very clear: to prohibit government officials from engaging in insider trading on prediction market platforms. The implied message is obvious—Kalshi is emphasizing its compliance stance and risk management mechanisms.

From an industry perspective, this reflects that prediction market platforms are facing increasingly strict regulatory scrutiny. Insider trading issues touch the compliance bottom line of such platforms. By actively embracing regulation and supporting legislation, Kalshi aims to establish a more transparent and responsible brand image. This competitive approach is quite interesting: no longer just competing on product and user experience, but also showcasing strength in compliance and risk control.

For users and investors, this competition reflects a broader trend toward the normalization of the prediction market ecosystem. Whether it’s Polymarket or Kalshi, both are under pressure from regulators and policymakers. Those who can better handle insider trading and ensure fair trading will gain an advantage in this competition.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterNoLossvip
· 01-11 01:22
This trick is to first shift the blame to Polymarket and then play the white lotus card oneself. Kalshi really knows how to play the game; they take the regulatory spotlight as a badge of honor, while users are the real money. Speaking of which, what's the point of compliance? We still have to wait for the final regulatory verdict. When will truly fair prediction markets ever appear? I think it's uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMakervip
· 01-08 13:37
Haha, Kalshi's recent moves are really just eye drops for Polymarket... Publicly claiming to support legislation to ban insider trading, but deep down just saying "look how compliant I am." The two are basically throwing each other under the bus, but honestly, isn't this good for users? At least someone is watching these platforms. But the key still depends on real cash execution; issuing statements is too cheap. The insider trading issue on Polymarket isn't fully clear yet, and Kalshi is rushing to jump on the bandwagon... Not very convincing. By the way, under this kind of regulatory pressure, is there still a way for small platforms to survive? It seems like in the end, only the top players will eat.
View OriginalReply0
MelonFieldvip
· 01-08 01:54
Haha, Kalshi's move really knows how to "ride the hype," huh? As soon as Polymarket has an issue, they're quick to show loyalty. Compliance sounds good, but can it really prevent front-running? I'm skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarryvip
· 01-08 01:46
The compliance stance is becoming more and more intense. To put it simply, it's just about who gets targeted first and who gets anxious.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCross-TalkClubvip
· 01-08 01:39
Laughing out loud, this is what you call "reporting myself" marketing, with compliance becoming the new competitive weapon.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)