2026-01-07 21:57:17

A major policy shift just rolled out. Trump signed a presidential memorandum directing the US to pull out of 66 international organizations—including 35 non-UN entities and 31 UN bodies. This isn't just bureaucratic reshuffling; it signals a significant reorientation of America's global posture.

What does this mean for crypto and Web3? Plenty. International organizations shape regulatory frameworks, cross-border compliance standards, and institutional participation guidelines. When a major economic power pivots its engagement, it ripples through everything from stablecoin governance discussions to DeFi protocol compliance with global entities.

The move could accelerate fragmentation in international financial standards. Countries may pursue more independent regulatory approaches, creating both opportunities and challenges for decentralized finance platforms navigating multiple jurisdictions. For crypto investors and builders, this underscores the importance of monitoring geopolitical shifts—they reshape the infrastructure underneath global markets faster than most realize.

DEFI10%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StillBuyingTheDip

· 01-07 22:26

Now the regulatory framework is fragmented, and it might actually be a positive? Countries are doing their own thing, and DeFi might have more room to survive.

View OriginalReply0

HashBandit

· 01-07 22:23

ngl this regulatory fragmentation thing hits different when you remember back in my mining days... bth the real question is whether this speeds up adoption or just makes compliance costs astronomical for everyone. either way, gas fees gonna stay ridiculous lmao

Reply0

Layer2Observer

· 01-07 22:12

Hmm... This move essentially opens a gap for regulatory fragmentation, but in the short term, it doesn't seem to have any substantial impact on the on-chain ecosystem. Let's look at the data. The main impact of the US withdrawing from these 66 organizations is on the development of cross-border compliance frameworks, rather than on the already established FATF standards or existing regulations. Those who might actually suffer are the regions still waiting for international consensus. Interestingly, could this accelerate some countries to develop their own CBDC frameworks? From an engineering perspective, regulatory fragmentation might actually be an opportunity for projects building multi-chain interoperability—since unified rules are scattered, it's better to adapt to multiple solutions early. The key is not to overinterpret this as "crypto entering a period of freedom"... The market loves this narrative, but grassroots compliance pressures won't really ease.

View OriginalReply0

Hash_Bandit

· 01-07 22:04

ngl, this regulatory fragmentation thing hits different when you're actually running nodes across multiple jurisdictions... seen this movie before, just on smaller scales. could get messy real quick or open doors—honestly depends who moves fastest

Reply0