It is no longer realistic to evaluate crypto projects solely based on "which exchange they are listed on." Because in the market, we see that some projects reach billion-dollar levels even without being listed on major exchanges. For example, consider that $LIT has reached a $3 billion FDV despite not being listed on any major exchange. At the same time, some projects listed on large exchanges can still perform poorly. This shows that exchange listing alone is not a determining factor for a project's success. It is important to understand that community, technology, use case, and market demand play much more significant roles.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenWhisperer
· 01-09 02:13
Really, Borsa listing isn't everything; the community is the real key, right?
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 01-08 06:26
Listing coins on exchanges is not really a hard indicator anymore. To be honest, I value community energy and practical use cases more.
View OriginalReply0
UserHWH
· 01-07 20:26
Well, say it even more awesome, since everyone is just a hype man anyway.
View OriginalReply1
DaisyUnicorn
· 01-07 17:58
To be honest, judging a project solely based on whether it is listed on major exchanges is really naive... Community consensus is the real key, and technology and application scenarios are the foundation. The $LIT example is very typical; it can achieve a 3 billion FDV without being listed on mainstream exchanges. In contrast, some coins on large exchanges have already faded away.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 01-07 17:55
Damn, this is what a sensible person would say. The crypto world is still debating whether to list on mainstream exchanges, but I've seen through it all. Community and real-world applications are the true keys.
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChain
· 01-07 17:42
Damn, it's really true. Listing on major exchanges isn't everything. The LIT example is amazing; even without mainstream exchanges, it still has a $3 billion valuation... It shows that community and real use cases still matter, don't be fooled by the exchange halo.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 01-07 17:42
That's right, someone should have pointed this out a long time ago. The Shanghai Stock Exchange is not the only truth.
It is no longer realistic to evaluate crypto projects solely based on "which exchange they are listed on." Because in the market, we see that some projects reach billion-dollar levels even without being listed on major exchanges. For example, consider that $LIT has reached a $3 billion FDV despite not being listed on any major exchange. At the same time, some projects listed on large exchanges can still perform poorly. This shows that exchange listing alone is not a determining factor for a project's success. It is important to understand that community, technology, use case, and market demand play much more significant roles.