Recently, SOL's market fluctuations have indeed given many KOLs reasons to recommend altcoins. Many so-called influencers have taken advantage of the midday market decline and shifted the blame for losses onto external factors. Hearing this logic repeatedly, it's clear that in the face of market volatility, someone is always eager to find a scapegoat. If you ask me, instead of following these voices, it's better to think more about whether projects without fundamental support are really worth engaging with.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiTooHigh
· 01-09 08:42
I'm really tired of these big Vs' talking points. Blaming external factors is enough? When they lose money on their chosen coins, they blame the market. This logic is unmatched.
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBro
· 01-06 16:55
Uh... it's the same old blame-shifting theory again. KOLs are really getting better at making up stories.
View OriginalReply0
StealthMoon
· 01-06 16:49
Here we go again with this routine. I've seen many KOLs shift blame, but I've never seen one admit they're bad at it.
View OriginalReply0
NotAFinancialAdvice
· 01-06 16:45
Big V blaming others all the time is really getting old; you still need to look at the fundamentals yourself.
Recently, SOL's market fluctuations have indeed given many KOLs reasons to recommend altcoins. Many so-called influencers have taken advantage of the midday market decline and shifted the blame for losses onto external factors. Hearing this logic repeatedly, it's clear that in the face of market volatility, someone is always eager to find a scapegoat. If you ask me, instead of following these voices, it's better to think more about whether projects without fundamental support are really worth engaging with.