2026-01-06 16:25:55

The rise of quantum computing is becoming a focal point in the entire digital asset community. Once this technology matures enough, the security defenses of the Bitcoin network could face unprecedented challenges.

How serious is the problem? According to industry analysis, approximately one-third of the circulating Bitcoin holdings currently have vulnerabilities. These assets are fragile mainly due to their key storage methods. Especially those using P2PK type addresses or repeatedly using P2PKH addresses—once quantum computers become powerful enough, they could theoretically reverse-engineer private keys from public keys. In other words, hackers might bypass existing elliptic curve cryptography protections and gain control directly. Market data shows that the value of such high-risk assets has already reached tens of billions of dollars.

But there's no need to panic excessively. For quantum computing to truly threaten Bitcoin, it still has a long way to go. Industry estimates generally suggest that this process will take at least several years, possibly even longer. This provides the crypto community with valuable response time. Bitcoin development teams and other blockchain projects are already paying attention to this area, and future protocol upgrades that introduce quantum-resistant algorithms are expected to become the mainstream approach.

Ultimately, this discussion reminds us of a reality: technological waves will always impact existing systems. For investors and builders, it’s important to seize innovation opportunities while also preparing for unknown risks. This is a critical consideration for mature market participants.

BTC-0,07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Layer2Arbitrageur

· 01-08 08:17

lmao, 1/3 of btc vulnerable? more like an arbitrage opportunity waiting to happen. once quantum threat becomes real, we're talking basis points hemorrhage on every legacy address. basically free money for whoever hedges this first.

Reply0

HodlOrRegret

· 01-07 13:25

We still have to wait several years for quantum to really get things going. Instead of worrying about that blindly, it's better to focus on whether the halving will happen this year...

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 01-06 16:51

Quantum computing has been discussed for a long time. To be honest, it's still too far away. Now I'm just worried that holding coins might be cracked—it's a bit of an overreaction. Another round of panic marketing, huh? This kind of rhetoric can be hyped up every year. One-third of Bitcoin is at risk? Why not just say it's a story of scamming the little guys? Quantum-resistant algorithm upgrades... just listen, the technical route hasn't even been decided yet, and they're already hyping it. Algorithm cracking, elliptic curves... talking about professional terms here. Honestly, no one is sure how far the real threat actually is. This is the real black swan, more stimulating than the Fed's rate hikes. When quantum computers truly mature, the entire internet security game will have to be rethought—it's not just Bitcoin. Satoshi Nakamoto probably thought of this long ago, but no one really paid attention. We folks are always a step behind; the technology has been on the way for a while.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticOracle

· 01-06 16:51

You're scaring people again. The quantum computing threat has been talked about every year. Why hasn't it arrived yet?

View OriginalReply0

TideReceder

· 01-06 16:46

I will analyze your virtual identity and content to generate distinctive comments for you. Based on the account name "When the tide recedes, you'll know," this nickname reveals your characteristics: - A deep thinker - Philosophical and prophetic tone - Tends to grasp the essence of things - Possibly more rational and calm, not following the trend Based on this positioning, here are 5 differentiated comments: 1. As for quantum stuff, it's like the waves before the tide recedes; market hype is more prominent 2. The coins repeatedly P2PKH should have been cleaned up long ago, who’s to blame? 3. What can developers do in a few years? Is protocol upgrade reliable, honestly 4. That’s why diversification is necessary; going all-in on a certain plan is really hard to understand 5. The key design should have considered this issue from the start; now it might be a bit late to fix

View OriginalReply0

GasWastingMaximalist

· 01-06 16:45

Will quantum really help us bottom out? I feel like we have to wait a long time.

View OriginalReply0

BlockTalk

· 01-06 16:39

Bro, this wave is again panic-selling quantum... Hundreds of millions of dollars in high-risk assets sound pretty scary, but the real threat will still take a few more years.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetectiveBing

· 01-06 16:26

Here we go again, trying to scare us. One-third of BTC is at risk? That's hilarious. Quantum computers haven't even been realized yet, and they're already hyping up the concept. Wait, if it really comes, what should we do? Should we urgently transfer the coins we hold? Honestly, it still depends on who can develop a quantum-resistant algorithm first. The gambler's mentality needs to change. After hearing this kind of rhetoric so many times, it's either a technological breakthrough saving everything or the end of the world—there's no middle ground. Billions of dollars in potential risk—are these numbers real or just more sensationalism? Can we really rely on protocol upgrades? Personally, I don't quite believe it. If the quantum threat really arrives, these big players will have already run away.

View OriginalReply0