Japanese-themed MEME coin 114514 (SOL) has recently gained popularity in the community, with a surge of over 2000 times on the 3rd, but behind this hype lies significant risk. GoPlus has issued a security alert pointing out that numerous fake tokens and Pixiu tokens with the same name have appeared on multiple public chains such as BSC and Base, aiming to trap followers. This is not an isolated case but a systemic risk currently facing the MEME coin ecosystem.
Why Fake Tokens and Pixiu Tokens Appear Frequently
The Price of 114514’s Popularity
The name 114514 originates from Japanese internet culture and has sparked a craze on the SOL chain as a MEME coin. When a coin skyrockets over 2000 times in a short period, it naturally attracts a lot of attention. But this attention also creates opportunities for scammers.
The logic of fake project creators is simple: leverage the fame and popularity of the original coin to quickly deploy identical or similar tokens on other chains. Ordinary users, eager to chase gains, can easily confuse contract addresses or chain origins, falling into traps.
The Hidden Harvest of Pixiu Tokens
Pixiu tokens are even more covert. These tokens often set asymmetric trading restrictions, allowing users to buy but not sell, or only the project team and certain addresses can sell. Once users buy in, their funds are locked, turning them into the project’s ATM.
According to the latest news, such risks have become common tactics in the MEME coin ecosystem. The HUNT incident exposed earlier by GoPlus is a typical case: an account claiming to be a PNUT developer attracted users with false profit stories, but in reality, it secretly issued multiple RUG pulls, harvesting $3.7 million within 8 days through a systematic network of addresses.
Why MEME Coins Are Particularly Prone to These Risks
Risk Factor
Specific Manifestation
Impact Level
Low Project Threshold
Anyone can quickly deploy tokens
Very low cost for fake tokens
Lack of User Awareness
Many don’t know how to verify contracts
Easy to be scammed
Information Asymmetry
Community info is chaotic, hard to distinguish real from fake
Scammers can easily manipulate
Strong Profit Motivation
Short-term surges attract many participants
Reduced risk awareness
Multi-chain Deployment
Same coin name exists on different chains
Increases confusion
How to Identify and Avoid Risks
Three Essential Checks Before Trading
Verify the Contract Address: Obtain the genuine contract address from official channels (official website, official social media). Do not rely on search engines or third-party reports.
Confirm the Blockchain Network: 114514 is on the SOL chain. If you want to trade on BSC or Base, it’s a fake token, and you should be especially cautious.
Check Liquidity and Holder Distribution: Real projects usually have relatively dispersed holders, while Pixiu tokens tend to be concentrated in a few addresses.
Watch Out for These Signals
Newly created contracts with no trading history
Highly concentrated holders (a few addresses control most tokens)
Very low liquidity in trading pairs
Confusing or inconsistent official community information
Promises of high returns or follow-the-leader schemes
Summary
The popularity of 114514 itself is not the problem; the issue is that scammers are exploiting this hype through fake tokens and Pixiu tokens to systematically harvest. GoPlus’s alert reminds us that the current MEME coin ecosystem faces high risks. Not only should we be wary of fake tokens, but we also need to understand the operational logic of hidden traps like Pixiu tokens.
For users, the most effective protection is to do thorough research before trading: verify the contract address, confirm the chain’s origin, and review basic project information. These seemingly tedious steps can often prevent funds from being lost. In the high-risk world of MEME coins, caution is always the top priority.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
After a 2000x increase from 114514, imitation coins and Pixiu tokens have spread across multiple chains.
Japanese-themed MEME coin 114514 (SOL) has recently gained popularity in the community, with a surge of over 2000 times on the 3rd, but behind this hype lies significant risk. GoPlus has issued a security alert pointing out that numerous fake tokens and Pixiu tokens with the same name have appeared on multiple public chains such as BSC and Base, aiming to trap followers. This is not an isolated case but a systemic risk currently facing the MEME coin ecosystem.
Why Fake Tokens and Pixiu Tokens Appear Frequently
The Price of 114514’s Popularity
The name 114514 originates from Japanese internet culture and has sparked a craze on the SOL chain as a MEME coin. When a coin skyrockets over 2000 times in a short period, it naturally attracts a lot of attention. But this attention also creates opportunities for scammers.
The logic of fake project creators is simple: leverage the fame and popularity of the original coin to quickly deploy identical or similar tokens on other chains. Ordinary users, eager to chase gains, can easily confuse contract addresses or chain origins, falling into traps.
The Hidden Harvest of Pixiu Tokens
Pixiu tokens are even more covert. These tokens often set asymmetric trading restrictions, allowing users to buy but not sell, or only the project team and certain addresses can sell. Once users buy in, their funds are locked, turning them into the project’s ATM.
According to the latest news, such risks have become common tactics in the MEME coin ecosystem. The HUNT incident exposed earlier by GoPlus is a typical case: an account claiming to be a PNUT developer attracted users with false profit stories, but in reality, it secretly issued multiple RUG pulls, harvesting $3.7 million within 8 days through a systematic network of addresses.
Why MEME Coins Are Particularly Prone to These Risks
How to Identify and Avoid Risks
Three Essential Checks Before Trading
Watch Out for These Signals
Summary
The popularity of 114514 itself is not the problem; the issue is that scammers are exploiting this hype through fake tokens and Pixiu tokens to systematically harvest. GoPlus’s alert reminds us that the current MEME coin ecosystem faces high risks. Not only should we be wary of fake tokens, but we also need to understand the operational logic of hidden traps like Pixiu tokens.
For users, the most effective protection is to do thorough research before trading: verify the contract address, confirm the chain’s origin, and review basic project information. These seemingly tedious steps can often prevent funds from being lost. In the high-risk world of MEME coins, caution is always the top priority.