2026-01-06 10:40:21

#2026年比特币行情展望 Politicians' attitudes towards cryptocurrencies are undergoing a shift. Recently, some have explicitly stated that the limitations of the traditional financial system are becoming increasingly apparent, and the future development of the financial system will point towards the deep integration of crypto assets and blockchain technology. This is not an isolated view but reflects a global cognitive shift in the evolution of financial forms.

What does this shift mean?

First, the value chain of financial intermediaries is being reorganized. The functions of traditional infrastructure such as banks and clearinghouses are gradually shifting towards smart contracts and on-chain protocols. Mainstream crypto assets like $BTC and $ETH represent two different paths of this transformation—one emphasizing value storage, the other emphasizing computation and application ecosystems.

Second, the rights confirmation, settlement, and trust mechanisms of assets are being redefined. When transactions are fully on-chain, timestamps and immutability become native features, greatly reducing the need for third-party endorsements. This will have profound impacts on the efficiency and transparency of the financial system.

Looking at the market level, in the past, cryptocurrencies were often viewed as risk assets or speculative tools. But when policy guidance clearly points towards "on-chain finance," market pricing logic shifts from concept speculation to institutional expectations. This is a qualitative change—from gambling psychology to rational assessment of future forms.

In the long term, participating in crypto assets may no longer be just about purchasing individual assets but about allocating to a whole new set of financial infrastructure. DeFi ecosystems, cross-chain interoperability, on-chain governance... these once niche topics are becoming essential concerns for financial practitioners.

Many in the market still focus on short-term fluctuations. But if this direction truly holds, the real opportunities could be far more profound than surface-level price increases.

BTC-0,09%

ETH0,19%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Degen4Breakfast

· 01-09 10:35

The policy shift has been talked about for a long time, and now finally someone dares to say it openly. --- To be honest, the banking system really needs a revolution. This time, it seems truly different. --- DeFi is still too early, I feel it will take a few more years for the market to accept it. --- I believe in Bitcoin as a store of value, but those things in the Ethereum ecosystem... investing can make money, but don’t ask me how to use them. --- Shifting from speculation to institutional expectations? Wake up, retail investors are still chasing gains and selling on dips. Don’t overestimate human nature. --- Long-term allocation is correct, but who knows when policies might change again. --- This article is well written, but the key is whether the execution can keep up. Right now, it’s mostly talk. --- On-chain finance is indeed the big direction. I’ve already been gradually adjusting my positions, anyway, it’s idle money. --- The judgment that traditional finance will be finished is too absolute. In the end, it will definitely coexist. --- Alright, another new cycle of dream-building, but this time it seems to have a bit of a different flavor.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseFOMOguy

· 01-09 09:04

The policy shift thing, huh? It sounds nice, but I still have to be the bearer of bad news—by the time the traditional financial system genuinely embraces on-chain finance, we'll have already been trapped. Wait, isn't this logic just the old "bright future" routine again?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d

· 01-08 15:17

Policy shifts... It's easy to say, but how many can really bear the cost? --- It's about institutional expectations and new financial infrastructure. Honestly, it's still a gamble on how long politicians can hold out. --- I agree with the logic of BTC and ETH diverging, but will it really materialize by 2026? Feels like it's still on paper. --- Is traditional finance dead? No. Will it be disrupted? Maybe, but don't be too optimistic. --- A must-read for DeFi practitioners... Haha, now even water sellers need to understand on-chain governance. --- Look at how many are truly investing in infrastructure, rather than just following the trend to buy in. --- Politicians changing their stance ≠ the market will really follow suit. That logic is a bit off. --- People with short-term volatility aren't fools; they just have a short-sighted view, which is different from being stupid.

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinArbitrageur

· 01-06 11:08

Politicians turning to listen sounds good, but actual implementation is the real deal. --- It's another policy expectation; whether this wave can truly move towards on-chain finance depends on various factors. --- Can DeFi really replace traditional finance? I still have some doubts. --- Mainstream coin allocation is correct, but don't just focus on short-term fluctuations; this is a long-term game. --- Replacing bank functions with smart contracts? Just thinking about the risks involved. --- Bitcoin is just Bitcoin; there's no need to make it so complicated. Isn't it better to just hold? --- Policy guidance is just for listening; actual implementation will take a long time. --- On-chain governance is indeed the future direction; I feel it's underestimated. --- I believe the opportunity is there, but the timeline might be longer than expected.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoTherapist

· 01-06 11:01

ngl, all this "institutional adoption" talk is just your portfolio's way of processing trauma from the last bear market. we're literally using financial policy as copium rn

Reply0

ForkItAll

· 01-06 10:53

Wake up, you can't believe everything politicians say; it's better to look at the data. Isn't this round just an excuse to justify harvesting the little guys? BTC is indeed a store of value, but on-chain finance will really take off only in ten years. It sounds good, but in reality, traditional finance doesn't want to be replaced at all; eventually, there will still be compromises and checks and balances. Everyone is hyping the DeFi ecosystem, but the problem is that the user experience is terrible right now. Policy shifts are a good sign, but don't be fooled; managing risks properly is the key. I just want to ask, where are the real institutional expectations? Or are they all talking past each other? Watching the 2026 outlook every day—let's just survive and make money first, brother.

View OriginalReply0

MetadataExplorer

· 01-06 10:43

Wait a minute, do politicians really change so quickly? Feels like just the day before yesterday they were still criticizing the crypto space. --- Honestly, banks definitely won't voluntarily give up their territory; it's not that simple. --- We've known about the DeFi ecosystem for a long time, the key is when it will truly be implemented. --- 2026? Let's see how things go next year first, just listen to the long-term expectations. --- From speculation to rational assessment, that statement sounds a bit vague; the market is always driven by emotions. --- On-chain governance, cross-chain, these are indeed the directions, but user experience still has a long way to go. --- The entire infrastructure setup sounds impressive, but small retail investors still have to bet on individual assets. --- Regulatory expectations? Let's wait and see how each country enforces regulations before jumping to conclusions. --- The view that BTC and ETH have different paths is pretty good, but attention from financial practitioners ≠ ordinary people making money. --- Surface-level gains versus deeper opportunities, the question is how much of that we can actually grasp.

View OriginalReply0