The recent trend of SOL can actually be divided into three completely different timeframes, each with its own logic. This is also why many people are easily shaken out—they confuse short-term noise with medium- and long-term trends.
**Limited Short-term Rebound Space**
Currently, this position (around $137.5-$140) is a typical oscillation rebound. This is not a V-shaped reversal but a normal correction near previous highs. The key resistance is at 142; if it can effectively hold here, there is room for further upward rebound. But if it repeatedly oscillates between 138-142, it indicates the market is still confirming the direction.
Support levels are at 127, and further down at 116. If it breaks below 116, it means the short-term structure is completely broken, and a reassessment is needed.
**Medium-term Variables Are Accumulating**
By the first half of 2026, SOL’s price center is expected to shift to the range of 150-170. It sounds optimistic, but there are two specific factors supporting this: continuous capital inflow into spot ETFs and technical upgrades at the Solana network layer (Firedancer and other performance optimizations) that are actually being implemented. If both progress smoothly, there’s even a possibility of breaking through $200.
But the premise is that it must not fall back below $100. Once it loses $100, the medium-term logic must be overturned and reassessed.
**Long-term Uncertainty Is Pulling**
If only looking at fundamentals and ecological development, a reasonable expectation for SOL in 2026 should be in the range of 180-220. Optimistically, if ecological expansion goes smoothly and stablecoins and payment scenarios are truly implemented, it could even reach 260+. But this estimate assumes no regulatory surprises and no sharp macro liquidity tightening.
The worst-case scenario is simultaneous regulatory and macro pressure, which could cause SOL to fall below $100 and enter an extremely pessimistic trend.
**Core Risks and Opportunities**
The driving forces supporting SOL’s rise include: seasonal factors (usually stronger in January after December adjustments), genuine inflow of spot ETF funds, and substantial improvements in network stability and performance. These are not just stories—they are being realized.
Caution is needed regarding: the stability of the Solana network remains a critical weakness; a serious incident could destroy valuation consensus. Meanwhile, ETH ecosystem Layer 2 solutions and other new blockchains are also diverting developers and capital. Changes in macro liquidity and regulatory attitudes could reverse at any time.
**Technical Reference Levels**
From RSI, SOL has returned to the bullish zone, but confirmation requires volume to stabilize at the 138 level. Upward resistance levels are sequentially 138, 144, 150, 170. Downside supports are at 127 and 116, with 100 as an emotional safeguard.
**Practical Trading Approach**
In the short term, if you want to participate in the rebound, a pullback to 124-127 is a good low-entry point, but be sure to set a stop-loss at 116. For chasing breakouts, wait for an effective break above 141 before entering, with targets at 146-150.
For the medium term, take profits in stages between 150-170 and avoid holding on stubbornly. If it breaks below 100, immediately reduce risk exposure and do not hold through the decline.
The last principle is risk management: for SOL as a single asset, its proportion in total assets should not exceed 10%. Once profits are realized, lock in gains with trailing stops to prevent a reversal of gains.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MergeConflict
· 01-09 10:11
Is the 138 line really that critical? Feels like we're constantly pulling back and forth here.
---
100 is really the emotional defense line. Once it's broken, the whole story has to be retold.
---
The mid-term logic sounds good, but there are too many prerequisites. ETF and Firedancer need to be realized simultaneously.
---
The main flaw is the stability issue. One accident and it's over. That's the biggest risk.
---
Splitting the payout between 150-170, what was said is correct, just afraid of greed and not exiting in time.
---
I agree with the 10% cap on a single coin, someone needs to learn to cut losses.
---
In an extreme scenario where regulation and macro factors both come into play, how much could SOL fall?
---
Breaking the 116 level means a complete reassessment; it’s no longer meaningful in the short term.
---
RSI is in a bullish zone but still needs confirmation. Can this rebound hold above 138?
---
Buying low at 124-127 sounds simple, but can you really hold onto it when executing?
View OriginalReply0
FunGibleTom
· 01-09 05:05
This analysis looks good, but I just want to ask, if it breaks 100, can it really be saved?
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlacker
· 01-06 10:59
By the way, this analysis has some substance. The three-dimensional framework is indeed clear, but I'm worried that those who are trapped might start to get tangled up again over the 138 line.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrain
· 01-06 10:57
The analysis is quite good, but to be honest, these numbers don't mean much to someone like me who prefers long-term holding. Anyway, I am just holding tight and not selling.
That 100 emotional defense line is indeed a bit fragile. If it really breaks, I fear everyone will run away.
If Firedancer can truly be implemented, that would be impressive. I'm just worried it might be another paper promise.
The short-term noise is well said. Watching the K-line for too many days can be really exhausting.
Based on what you said, I guess I should wait for a retracement to 124 before buying in, but I’m afraid of missing the chance to get in.
The Layer 2 offloading on ETH is indeed a problem, and SOL really needs to consider its competitiveness.
Right now, it’s a gamble whether ETF funds are strong enough. Looking at the fundamentals alone, it’s not quite solid enough.
The 10% allocation limit is a bit conservative, but risk control first, no problem.
It still seems that the performance after the New Year in January will be the key; I’ll just observe December for now.
View OriginalReply0
VCsSuckMyLiquidity
· 01-06 10:44
Damn, it's the same three-dimensional analysis again. I'm tired of it. I just want to know if it's still profitable to buy the dip now.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 01-06 10:43
Once again, it got shaken out, and it happens every time... really need to learn to distinguish which dimension is speaking.
If you can't hold the 100 line, then a reassessment is necessary. Are you still believing that ETF and Firedancer can lift it up?
Risk control is the most important, brother. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
If the rebound reaches 142, you should consider reducing your position, don't wait for the $260 story to come in and pick up the pieces.
When will SOL's stability issue be fixed? Are there other new public chains eyeing the market?
View OriginalReply0
not_your_keys
· 01-06 10:38
Hey, this analysis is indeed comprehensive, but I just want to ask... do you really think ETF funds will flow in continuously?
The recent trend of SOL can actually be divided into three completely different timeframes, each with its own logic. This is also why many people are easily shaken out—they confuse short-term noise with medium- and long-term trends.
**Limited Short-term Rebound Space**
Currently, this position (around $137.5-$140) is a typical oscillation rebound. This is not a V-shaped reversal but a normal correction near previous highs. The key resistance is at 142; if it can effectively hold here, there is room for further upward rebound. But if it repeatedly oscillates between 138-142, it indicates the market is still confirming the direction.
Support levels are at 127, and further down at 116. If it breaks below 116, it means the short-term structure is completely broken, and a reassessment is needed.
**Medium-term Variables Are Accumulating**
By the first half of 2026, SOL’s price center is expected to shift to the range of 150-170. It sounds optimistic, but there are two specific factors supporting this: continuous capital inflow into spot ETFs and technical upgrades at the Solana network layer (Firedancer and other performance optimizations) that are actually being implemented. If both progress smoothly, there’s even a possibility of breaking through $200.
But the premise is that it must not fall back below $100. Once it loses $100, the medium-term logic must be overturned and reassessed.
**Long-term Uncertainty Is Pulling**
If only looking at fundamentals and ecological development, a reasonable expectation for SOL in 2026 should be in the range of 180-220. Optimistically, if ecological expansion goes smoothly and stablecoins and payment scenarios are truly implemented, it could even reach 260+. But this estimate assumes no regulatory surprises and no sharp macro liquidity tightening.
The worst-case scenario is simultaneous regulatory and macro pressure, which could cause SOL to fall below $100 and enter an extremely pessimistic trend.
**Core Risks and Opportunities**
The driving forces supporting SOL’s rise include: seasonal factors (usually stronger in January after December adjustments), genuine inflow of spot ETF funds, and substantial improvements in network stability and performance. These are not just stories—they are being realized.
Caution is needed regarding: the stability of the Solana network remains a critical weakness; a serious incident could destroy valuation consensus. Meanwhile, ETH ecosystem Layer 2 solutions and other new blockchains are also diverting developers and capital. Changes in macro liquidity and regulatory attitudes could reverse at any time.
**Technical Reference Levels**
From RSI, SOL has returned to the bullish zone, but confirmation requires volume to stabilize at the 138 level. Upward resistance levels are sequentially 138, 144, 150, 170. Downside supports are at 127 and 116, with 100 as an emotional safeguard.
**Practical Trading Approach**
In the short term, if you want to participate in the rebound, a pullback to 124-127 is a good low-entry point, but be sure to set a stop-loss at 116. For chasing breakouts, wait for an effective break above 141 before entering, with targets at 146-150.
For the medium term, take profits in stages between 150-170 and avoid holding on stubbornly. If it breaks below 100, immediately reduce risk exposure and do not hold through the decline.
The last principle is risk management: for SOL as a single asset, its proportion in total assets should not exceed 10%. Once profits are realized, lock in gains with trailing stops to prevent a reversal of gains.