By early 2026, the crypto market is experiencing a subtle tug-of-war. On one side are the regulators delaying their timetable, on the other are the giants accelerating their strategic deployments, and on top of that are the increasingly difficult days for miners—these three forces are intertwined, reshaping the entire industry's trajectory.
From a policy perspective, the much-anticipated U.S. Market Structure Act for cryptocurrencies is progressing much slower than expected. The latest report from investment bank TD Cowen revealed a shocking figure: this core legislation, which should clarify industry rules, is now expected to be delayed until 2027 for passage, and actual implementation might not happen until 2029. Why so slow? Simply put, political battles in Congress are ongoing, coupled with the upcoming elections, causing everyone to hold back and watch.
Currently, the Democratic Party has little incentive to accelerate this process, as they are betting on the midterm elections in 2026, hoping to regain control of the House. But there is a silver lining—those staff members in the Senate have been studying the technical details for several months. As long as the Democrats are willing to sit down and negotiate, this bill could be pushed forward quickly. The harsh reality is that the ultimate rules for the crypto industry are likely to be directly influenced by the outcome of the presidential election.
It is worth noting that although progress at the federal level has stalled, the advancement of U.S. crypto policy has not come to a complete halt. The Senate plans to hold a dedicated hearing on the Market Structure Act in January 2026, and the SEC is also not idle—multiple signals indicate that even though the regulatory framework is not yet finalized, all parties are already preparing for the upcoming major moves.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedTwice
· 01-09 10:23
Will it only pass in 2027 and only be implemented in 2029? Brothers, I really can't keep up with this pace, politicians are truly just acting.
How are miners supposed to survive now, squeezed in the middle.
Only the US can pull off such a stunt as betting on the presidential election results, hilarious.
Regulation is always on the way, big players have long been ambushed.
Wait, wait, wait, it feels like everyone is just waiting, who can actually buy the dip?
SEC's move still has some tricks, at least they haven't completely given up.
Where are the clear rules we were promised? Now they are even more vague, damn.
With this speed, by 2029, Bitcoin will have already turned the world upside down, what regulation framework is needed?
The mid-term elections are the real weight, crypto is just a side show.
Now, those entering mining are probably just newbies, but those who can persist at this time are truly tough.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCat
· 01-09 08:53
It's another wait until 2029, haha. With this speed, it's faster to create our own coin.
Congress just knows how to bicker; big players are overjoyed, miners are sighing and complaining.
The Democrats are thinking about the midterm elections, so they don't care about our bill anymore, it's tough.
The Senate said they've been studying it for several months, but it feels like they haven't studied anything.
Honestly, in the end, it all depends on who becomes president; rules just follow power.
The SEC is secretly moving, but I don't really trust their preparations.
They'll hold hearings in 2026, and it won't take effect until 2029? That's about right, haha.
Miners are really having a hard time now. If this keeps up, how can we make money?
Instead of waiting for the bill, why not buy the dip and accumulate coins? Anyway, we've already wasted time.
Regulation will always be the last shoe to drop. Let's just lie back and wait.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrant
· 01-08 16:11
Another political game, another timetable. In the end, isn't it just dragging on?
Policy bottlenecks cause suffering for miners, while giants happily hoard land. These game rules are really heartless.
Wait, it’s only going to be implemented in 2029? Are those people trying to wear us out? Haha.
Where are the clear rules promised? Even after all the Bitcoin is mined, the bill still hasn't passed.
Senate hearings? Listening is pointless; in the end, it all depends on the president’s mood.
Regulation really is like this—one moment there's no motivation, the next they want to push quickly. Anyway, retail investors are always the ones hurt.
This wave of market movement depends on who can endure until 2029. As for me, I can't wait.
Miners are really having a tough time now; all the risks are on their shoulders.
Instead of waiting for policies, it’s better to watch what the giants are doing. They must know something.
Another industry hijacked by elections. It's too absurd.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidated
· 01-07 16:05
Will it only be implemented in 2029? That's funny. Our coins have already reached the moon.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidated
· 01-06 10:56
Implementation in 2029? Haha, that's hilarious. Politicians really know how to drag things out. Do we retail investors still have to keep betting on the snake?
Regulation is just a chip for the big players; we have to find our own way.
Honestly, the longer it drags, the deeper the giants'布局, and we ordinary folks become more passive.
I can understand miners struggling, but political cycles determining rules? That's just ridiculous.
At the federal level, delays are increasing with more small moves. What does that imply?
Elections determine the direction of rules... I understand this logic, but whoever wins, we follow whoever it is.
2029... brothers, by then the market will have already turned upside down. What's the point of stressing over this now?
Senate hearings? Just superficial show, real power still in the hands of those few big guys.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 01-06 10:55
ngl, 2029 for real implementation? that's literally mile 15 of a ultra-marathon we didn't sign up for. meanwhile institutions are stacking anyway lol
Reply0
YieldWhisperer
· 01-06 10:54
2027?lol, they're being generous. actually the math doesn't check out on this timeline—congress moves like molasses when there's no incentive. miners are already bleeding out while we wait for politicians to finish their theater act. saw this exact delay pattern back in 2021, spoiler: nothing changes until someone's portfolio gets rekt badly enough.
Reply0
MoonRocketman
· 01-06 10:51
Will it only pass in 2027? Will it only be implemented in 2029? The launch window is dragging out too ridiculously; RSI has long been overbought.
---
Regulation, to put it plainly, is just a bargaining chip in political games; they don't really want to push it forward.
---
The giants have already laid out their plans; are we retail investors still waiting for rules? The orbit has already been seized by others.
---
Another Senate hearing? It feels like just a pie-in-the-sky promise; the real fuel supply still depends on the election results.
---
Miners are going through tough times, and that's the real issue; bills and regulations are all just empty talk.
---
Implementation in 2029? Then I need to calculate escape velocity; I might have already escaped long ago.
---
This tug-of-war is really just waiting for the election; whoever wins gets to decide. The fate of the crypto industry is truly hanging in the balance.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMelonWatcher
· 01-06 10:48
It's the same old political game, but we miners are the ones really suffering.
---
Implemented only in 2029? That'll have to wait until the Year of the Monkey and the Horse.
---
Basically, it's a gamble on elections. We retail investors just follow along and mess around.
---
The Senate folks have been researching for months with no progress. I bet there's no hope.
---
Regulation is always just on paper; exchanges have long been playing their own game.
---
Mining is tough, politicians are in meetings, and we're losing money.
---
As long as the Democrats are willing to sit down? Forget it, they care about other things.
---
Hearings after hearings, each one bigger in name than in substance.
---
It feels like Bitcoin's price swings are faster than this bill.
---
It's incredible—elections decide the future of crypto, and no one can top this logic.
View OriginalReply0
ForeverBuyingDips
· 01-06 10:48
Will it be implemented in 2029? Ha, I’m afraid we won’t live to see that day
---
Political games are like this, us retail investors should not think too much, bottom-fishing is the way to go
---
The miners really can’t hold on anymore, this rhythm is like a roller coaster
---
The SEC is holding back a big move, I feel there will be a major development in 2026
---
Election determines the rules? Laughable, capital has long decided everything
---
Hearings, hearings, every year we listen, yet our coin prices still fall
By early 2026, the crypto market is experiencing a subtle tug-of-war. On one side are the regulators delaying their timetable, on the other are the giants accelerating their strategic deployments, and on top of that are the increasingly difficult days for miners—these three forces are intertwined, reshaping the entire industry's trajectory.
From a policy perspective, the much-anticipated U.S. Market Structure Act for cryptocurrencies is progressing much slower than expected. The latest report from investment bank TD Cowen revealed a shocking figure: this core legislation, which should clarify industry rules, is now expected to be delayed until 2027 for passage, and actual implementation might not happen until 2029. Why so slow? Simply put, political battles in Congress are ongoing, coupled with the upcoming elections, causing everyone to hold back and watch.
Currently, the Democratic Party has little incentive to accelerate this process, as they are betting on the midterm elections in 2026, hoping to regain control of the House. But there is a silver lining—those staff members in the Senate have been studying the technical details for several months. As long as the Democrats are willing to sit down and negotiate, this bill could be pushed forward quickly. The harsh reality is that the ultimate rules for the crypto industry are likely to be directly influenced by the outcome of the presidential election.
It is worth noting that although progress at the federal level has stalled, the advancement of U.S. crypto policy has not come to a complete halt. The Senate plans to hold a dedicated hearing on the Market Structure Act in January 2026, and the SEC is also not idle—multiple signals indicate that even though the regulatory framework is not yet finalized, all parties are already preparing for the upcoming major moves.