2026-01-06 09:20:44

Recently, Goldman Sachs released a major forecast about the global economic landscape in 2075, sparking much discussion. The core idea is quite straightforward: over the next half-century, the global economic map will be completely reshaped, with India and Indonesia rising as economic leaders, while traditional developed economies face relative decline.

This is not just a change in rankings but a fundamental paradigm shift. Accompanying this will be asset price revaluation, comprehensive supply chain adjustments, and significant fluctuations in market liquidity. Everyone will inevitably be impacted by this transformation.

Thinking carefully, in such a broad context, what is the most valuable? Clearly, it’s not just traditional hard assets. What is more scarce is the ability to access accurate information, independently verify data, and break free from information monopolies. Data asymmetry and centralized decision-making in traditional financial systems often widen the information gap further during major upheavals.

This is precisely why some are beginning to focus on infrastructure like decentralized oracle networks. In a future full of uncertainties, true protection and opportunities may come from the re-competition for the right to access information.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCry

· 01-09 00:43

Goldman Sachs is once again fueling anxiety; who knows what 2075 will bring. I believe in India's rise, but the logical chain is too loose. That said, information rights are indeed valuable, but those hyping oracles should be careful not to get chopped up in a rug pull. Predictions 50 years from now are less meaningful than what you actually hold in your hands today. Decentralization sounds good, but in reality, it's still the big players who call the shots.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketLightning

· 01-06 20:03

India will become a superpower by 2075, which sounds still far from us. This Goldman Sachs report seems to be serving a certain asset narrative. The major reshuffle of the supply chain definitely warrants attention to the South Asian market. The point about reassigning information rights is interesting, but can decentralization truly solve information asymmetry? I have my doubts. Traditional assets still need to be allocated; don't be completely fooled by new narratives. I've heard a lot about super cycles, but I still need to do my own research and verification. These super cycle theories always seem a bit exaggerated, but they are worth pondering.

View OriginalReply0

rugdoc.eth

· 01-06 09:50

The economic landscape 50 years from now... To be honest, I'm more concerned about next year's coin prices haha The tactics are a bit deep, and the information barrier really hits the mark Goldman Sachs predictions are just for listening, don't take them seriously Decentralized oracles are indeed a good idea, but it's still in the early stages India's rise is credible, given the population base But to be honest, real alpha still depends on digging through the data yourself

View OriginalReply0

PoetryOnChain

· 01-06 09:47

India's rise has been talked about for how many years, but I haven't seen much change anyway. How can Goldman Sachs' report truly represent the truth? Who knows what it will be like fifty years from now. The reallocation of information rights is quite interesting; centralized finance indeed hides too many tricks. Decentralized oracles sound good, but can they really reliably transmit data? That's the question. Instead of waiting until 2075, it's better to find ways to seize the information gap now—that's real hard currency. By the way, do oracles really help individual investors? Or is it just another excuse to cut the leeks? Even if the economic landscape changes, human greed won't change. There will always be winners and losers.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 01-06 09:31

Will we still not know what the world looks like in 50 years? Goldman Sachs's prediction is really a bit far-fetched. --- Information monopoly is truly the biggest pitfall; the old tricks of centralized finance are still being used. --- No hype, no blackening; decentralization is indeed the inevitable future. Getting on board early is never wrong. --- I believe in India's rise, but the logical leap is a bit too fast... directly to oracles? --- Basically, traditional finance is doomed; you need to control your own information channels and understand. --- Whatever Goldman Sachs says, I do the opposite; after all, the gut decides the brain. --- 2075 is too far away; what we care about is what will happen next year... Is it interesting to talk about this now? --- Repricing assets might bankrupt me; better to focus on things that can make money first. --- It's really about being cautious, but is the real situation really that simple... --- Gaining information weight? Well, Web3 is the most transparent after all; at least you can see the ledger.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainArchaeologist

· 01-06 09:22

Goldman Sachs's 2075 prediction is honestly just selling anxiety Everyone knows India is rising, but the question is who will be alive to see it in the next 50 years The claim of having the right to access information is nice-sounding, but the on-chain data held by big players isn't much more transparent than mine. Don't deceive yourself Supply chain adjustments are real, and asset re-pricing is real, but I don't really buy into the oracle predictions Such macro forecasts are basically astrology; Goldman Sachs's own trading record isn't exactly impressive Instead of studying 2075, it's better to focus on the cycle trends of next year. Being pragmatic is more realistic

View OriginalReply0