The open-source community stands on its own. We're not a subsidiary of any tech giant—we're Linux. That distinction matters. It's about independence, transparency, and the power of collective contribution. In a world where corporations control platforms, this commitment to self-determination is what keeps the ecosystem genuine and resilient. The future belongs to those who build systems, not those who own them.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeDodger
· 01-06 07:56
Really, open source is much more comfortable than being controlled by big corporations. Your own stuff, you get to decide everything, and that feels great.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterX
· 01-06 07:55
The core is this statement: build, not own. Web3 should move in this direction.
View OriginalReply0
CoconutWaterBoy
· 01-06 07:54
Really, the open-source community is different. Only by not being hijacked by big corporations can we truly live like individuals.
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarian
· 01-06 07:52
Exactly, that's the logic. Big companies want to control everything, but the open-source community simply doesn't buy into that.
The open-source community stands on its own. We're not a subsidiary of any tech giant—we're Linux. That distinction matters. It's about independence, transparency, and the power of collective contribution. In a world where corporations control platforms, this commitment to self-determination is what keeps the ecosystem genuine and resilient. The future belongs to those who build systems, not those who own them.