If reserves were truly backed by gold instead of fiat currency, the distribution of benefits would shift dramatically. Savers, gold holders, and export-focused economies would come out ahead—something that doesn't happen under unlimited fiat expansion. Gold-backed systems impose real monetary discipline, making it harder for policymakers to inflate their way out of problems. The trade-off is clear: those who benefit from currency debasement lose their advantage, while those holding hard assets gain protection. It's a fundamental reset of who wins in the financial system.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
blocksnark
· 15h ago
Well said. It's just that right now, these central bankers are having too much fun printing money. Once the gold standard is reinstated, they'll have to behave.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskVictim
· 01-06 19:26
Basically, it's a reshuffle, but in reality? The government will never give up the right to print money.
View OriginalReply0
just_vibin_onchain
· 01-06 05:50
That's correct. Returning to the gold standard is like flipping the game rules; whoever holds hard assets is the real winner.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiac
· 01-06 05:49
Honestly, can the gold standard system really be implemented... Does the current power structure allow it?
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfer
· 01-06 05:49
Honestly, the gold standard theory sounds great, but the reality of implementing it might be another story...
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 01-06 05:48
Once the gold standard was implemented, the printing presses had to shut down. This is true fair competition.
View OriginalReply0
0xLostKey
· 01-06 05:26
Is the gold standard really coming back and able to save the world? Wake up, will the central banks allow it?
If reserves were truly backed by gold instead of fiat currency, the distribution of benefits would shift dramatically. Savers, gold holders, and export-focused economies would come out ahead—something that doesn't happen under unlimited fiat expansion. Gold-backed systems impose real monetary discipline, making it harder for policymakers to inflate their way out of problems. The trade-off is clear: those who benefit from currency debasement lose their advantage, while those holding hard assets gain protection. It's a fundamental reset of who wins in the financial system.