2026-01-06 03:20:44

#以太坊大户持仓变化 BCH buy orders are quite interesting—large orders are placed and then canceled immediately, repeatedly, which really leaves people confused. Is this truly genuine buying or just tentative orders? This "place and cancel" phenomenon is becoming more and more frequent in the market. I don't know if the main players are testing price levels or if the funds are genuinely hesitant. Watching the market fluctuate like this is really exhausting.

ETH-0,04%

BCH-0,86%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PositionPhobia

· 01-08 21:46

The main players are tired of this routine; placing orders and canceling instantly just to tease people.

View OriginalReply0

NftMetaversePainter

· 01-08 19:33

actually, the algorithmic patterns in these order book fluctuations reveal something fascinating about market topology... it's like watching generative art in real-time, except most traders can't perceive the underlying hash structure. the sheer computational beauty of these withdrawal mechanics—instant placement, instant cancellation—that's where true digital sovereignty emerges, tbh

Reply0

CryptoGoldmine

· 01-08 03:09

The term "price testing" is too mild. Looking at the network effect of computing power in the depth chart, it's clear this is a typical market maker behavior. The key is to look at the trading volume-to-liquidity ratio—if you don't believe it, you can pull up 30 days of data for comparison.

View OriginalReply0

CountdownToBroke

· 01-06 03:45

The main players are tired of using this trick, really. Every time they place orders to scare retail investors, it's so annoying.

View OriginalReply0

WalletManager

· 01-06 03:40

I've seen this set of main force testing methods many times—placing orders and canceling instantly is just to probe the bottom liquidity. To put it simply, it's about confirming the chip cost. If they really wanted to dump, they would have done it directly. I'm actually more interested in on-chain wallet holdings data—that's the real gold and silver. Once you see through these fake orders, they lose all meaning.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekNewSickle

· 01-06 03:40

Coming back with this again? Trying out price levels to trigger a dump, the funds are hesitating? No way, this is the main force washing out the chips.

View OriginalReply0

unrekt.eth

· 01-06 03:38

The main players are playing this trick very skillfully, retail investors are getting dizzy... It feels like this wave of BCH is just a test, the real move hasn't come yet.

View OriginalReply0

consensus_failure

· 01-06 03:25

The main force's technique is really brilliant, teasing investors every day and causing retail traders to mess around aimlessly.

View OriginalReply0