2026-01-04 07:24:52

The Flow network has resumed normal operation, with the Cadence and EVM two major execution environments fully launched. Currently, over 99.9% of accounts have regained full operational permissions in both environments, and account recovery and token repair work are ongoing.

The Flow team plans to release a detailed analysis report of this security incident within 48 hours. The incident has had some impact on the DeFi ecosystem on Flow, but as the network recovers and functions are gradually restored, ecosystem projects are gradually returning to normal operation.

The team emphasizes that the dual-engine architecture of the two execution environments ensures the flexibility of the Flow chain—Cadence provides a highly secure smart contract environment, while EVM compatibility offers convenience for Ethereum ecosystem project developers. The recovery process also validated the resilience of this architecture.

FLOW-3,22%

ETH3,29%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHarvester

· 01-07 07:07

99.9% has recovered? So what's going on with the 0.1% guys? The dual-engine architecture is indeed powerful. This crisis has actually tested the system's resilience. Let's wait for the detailed report to see where the problem really was. Flow's DeFi projects have made it through, not easy.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 01-07 04:04

99.9% recovered? What about the 0.1%? Could it be me?

View OriginalReply0

GasGrillMaster

· 01-06 19:59

99.9%？ And the 0.1% of brothers probably have to wait for death haha --- The dual-engine architecture sounds awesome, but the key is whether there will be similar surprises later on --- Recovery is recovery, but I wonder if this incident will scare away some liquidity --- 48-hour report? The speed is okay, at least more transparent than some projects --- Cadence plus EVM setup is indeed more flexible than a single chain, but honestly, who trusted it a few days ago --- The impact on the DeFi ecosystem is the key... How many top projects have truly come back --- Architectural resilience? Might as well just say the bugs are fixed, what's the point of fancy wording --- What about that 0.1% of accounts? Just stuck like that? --- Is this rebound real or just a fleeting light? We have to see what the weekly chart says

View OriginalReply0

TopEscapeArtist

· 01-06 09:00

99.9% recovery? So how does the 0.1% guy feel now, haha --- The dual-engine architecture is so resilient, why did it have to blow up again earlier? The technical outlook looks pretty stable, but the head and shoulders pattern has already been locked in after this wave. --- A detailed report in 48 hours? I bet five bucks that by the time the report comes out, this news will have already been drowned out. --- Basically, it was just bottom fishing. Now claiming the architecture is resilient—give me a break. The MACD hasn't even had a golden cross yet. --- "DeFi ecosystem 'will definitely be affected'," this phrase is used perfectly, clearly packaging negative news in a very obvious way.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 01-04 07:53

99.9% has recovered, what about the 0.1%? Are you still waiting anxiously? Flow's dual-engine architecture is indeed impressive; it remains stable when it matters most. We need to review the security incident analysis report; don't let it be the usual templated excuse again. The DeFi ecosystem has taken a hit; it's time for serious reflection. So, what's the final story on Cadence? Any insider news, brother? Such a major incident recovering so quickly—either highly professional or just fooling around; hard to tell. The EVM compatibility design is clever, directly attracting Ethereum users. The 0.1% of accounts probably need to be handled separately, which is a nightmare. We'll know if the resilience is strong once the report is out; just talking won't do.

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 01-04 07:50

99.9% recovered and still slowly fixing? The speed is a bit concerning. This incident with Flow served as a stress test for the dual-engine architecture, and its resilience is indeed proven. Waiting for the detailed report to see exactly where the flaw was. After all the commotion in the DeFi ecosystem, I feel like I need to observe a bit more. By the way, the Cadence and EVM compatibility design sounds pretty appealing in theory.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 01-04 07:49

It's okay, it's okay, Flow has finally survived. 99.9% account recovery, this number looks pretty good, just not sure how that 0.1% guy is doing haha. Wait, the dual-engine approach sounds good, but can Cadence and EVM really work together so seamlessly? Or are there still various adaptation issues. Flow has recovered quite a bit this time, but has the dfi ecosystem really bounced back, or is it just a pretty number on paper while still lying dormant? Waiting for the 48-hour report, just to see the details, hopefully not another set of official rhetoric. Verifying resilience during the recovery process? That’s called getting beaten up and luckily not falling apart, bro.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-2fce706c

· 01-04 07:33

I've long said that the Flow dual-engine architecture is a strategic advantage. Many people are still concerned about security incidents, but this is actually the best opportunity for strategic positioning. The rapid recovery indicates that the underlying design is indeed solid. Opportunities like this wait for no one.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 01-04 07:31

Wow, 99.9% recovered? What about the 0.1% guys... Forget it, the dual-engine architecture is indeed impressive. Not crashing completely this time is also a stroke of luck.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 01-04 07:26

It should be noted that the 99.9% figure is a bit exaggerated... Can on-chain data really be this precise? Laughs. According to the logic in the white paper, Cadence and EVM dual engines sound good, but recovery speed is the key. Don't just hype up the architectural resilience.

View OriginalReply0