2026-01-03 07:25:55

Some technical practitioners shared an interesting observation in the tech community: many platform backend algorithms infer users' economic pressure levels based on their behavior patterns.

For example, users who are active late at night and accept all kinds of orders are once deemed "high dependency" by the system, and the frequency of push notifications for high-commission tasks actually decreases. The platform's logic is straightforward—since users are willing to take on $6 tasks, why offer $15 ones?

The result is quite ironic: high-quality orders are left to those occasional users, aiming to make them feel "valued" and keep them active. Conversely, those who treat this as their main job and truly rely on this income are systemically given lower rewards.

This phenomenon can be seen across many platforms—from incentives for market makers on exchanges, community task distribution, to user tiering in various centralized applications—all contain similar cost-optimization logic behind them. When platforms have complete data and pricing power, they always find ways to give the least to those who need it most. This is also why decentralized and transparent mechanism design is becoming increasingly important.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StableGeniusDegen

· 01-06 07:24

This is the true face of centralized platforms; those who suffer the most are often the ones who rely on them the most.

View OriginalReply0

wrekt_but_learning

· 01-06 05:31

This is the true face of centralized platforms— the more hungry, the more they exploit users. --- Damn, how can this logic be so heartbreaking? The most dependent ones end up earning the least? --- No wonder I’ve now gone all-in on decentralization. Transparent mechanisms are the way to go. --- I understand the feeling of receiving a 6-dollar order that makes you want to vomit. Platforms are really calculating every desperate person. --- So, returning to on-chain is the way out; no one can manipulate your data. --- That’s why DeFi, despite its risks, still attracts people—centralization is too dark. --- Haha, the most ironic thing is that the more the system understands you, the more it tricks you. Privacy and rights are truly two sides of the same coin. --- Is it the same with exchanges? Oh my, I used to think that market maker incentives were genuinely "incentives." --- All I can say is, I firmly support decentralization. Let the algorithms go to hell. --- This algorithm design is really brilliant; even the art of cutting leeks has been turned into a spectacle.

View OriginalReply0

PermabullPete

· 01-05 19:05

It's incredible. This is the fatal flaw of centralized platforms—whoever controls the data controls your very life. The tactic of using algorithms to manipulate familiarity has long been seen in crypto. That's why I've always said that on-chain transparency mechanisms are the future; otherwise, you're just a victim being harvested. This logic is so heartbreaking— the more money you need, the harder it is to earn. The DEX approach is the correct way—no black-box operations.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 01-04 05:44

Algorithms have killed the dreams of the underlying people, damn it, how ironic --- Playing with a hammer, the platform is just a vampire, the hungrier it gets, the more it sucks --- So it's true, decentralization is the only way out --- Late-night coders are being precisely harvested, this is the reality --- Taking on work worth 6 yuan, and still expecting 15 yuan? Deserved to be suppressed --- Centralization is the original sin, there's no escape --- This logic is just as dark wherever you put it, I'm disgusted --- Transparency score 0, a platform model full of PUA --- If the system sees through you, how can you turn things around? So hopeless --- The higher the dependency, the more vicious the cut, who can stand that? --- Web3 really needs to improve, or it's all in vain --- The irony lies in the more effort you put in, the more you're devalued

View OriginalReply0

DancingCandles

· 01-03 07:55

Damn, that's why I always feel like I've been cut, turns out the system is secretly watching how hungry I am. Being identified as "high dependency" and getting directly charged commissions—this logic is just perfect... No wonder I have to pretend to be an amateur player. This is the vampiric nature of centralized platforms; the more money they lack, the more they squeeze. Decentralized transparent mechanisms are becoming increasingly necessary, or else you'll always be harvested like a leek by the platform. The algorithm's judgment that you are under financial pressure is absolutely ruthless; there's no humanity in it. I see this logic reflected most clearly in exchanges: new users always get Easter eggs, while old users are just left to fate. Ultimately, it's a problem of information asymmetry—platforms control all your actions but hide their pricing logic from you.

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceNightmare

· 01-03 07:50

Damn, this algorithm is really genius. The hungrier we get, the less we feed, and the platform is just betting that we have no choice.

View OriginalReply0

HackerWhoCares

· 01-03 07:46

Algorithms have killed sincerity, now even poverty can be precisely priced --- Working late at night and still being exposed, emotionally exhausting --- Damn, this logic is really brilliant, the more desperate you are, the more you're exploited --- Platform: If you need me, I need you even less. Perfect --- Isn't this just the old trick of Web2? Centralization should die --- No wonder those big players can't get good orders, they are played to death by the system --- Exactly, we need transparent on-chain mechanisms, no more being humiliated by algorithms --- It's so heartbreaking, exactly what people like me are saying --- As long as you control the pricing power, the weakest will always be the cheapest --- Decentralization is not a gimmick, it's a way out

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusDissenter

· 01-03 07:37

This set of cutting methods on the platform is really brilliant; the more desperate you are, the more you're cut. I've seen through it long ago. Algorithms are just vampires; they can tell who is most in need of money. That's why we need things on the chain—transparency needs to be established. Artificial intelligence can deceive people; we're constantly being exploited by these invisible rules and earning from them. So, centralized platforms are just traps; they completely dominate retail investors with data discrepancies and information asymmetry. It seems I have to start trading on the chain myself, or else I'm just working for the platform. This logic works just as well in the crypto space; exchanges are probably playing the same game.

View OriginalReply0

RektDetective

· 01-03 07:36

Relying on this set of logic, the platform is truly incredible, packaging poverty traps into algorithms and selling them to you --- Late-night online = out of money? The system's logic is truly inhumane --- Decentralization is still too idealistic; CEX's way of doing things is really ugly --- I've seen through this trick a long time ago; the hungriest wolves are the ones who can't get the meat --- Isn't this just a modern form of exploitation? Just a different name for an algorithm --- That's why transparency in DEX and on-chain mechanisms is so crucial --- Feeling exhausted, the more dependent you are, the more severely you're exploited; that's how the platform thinks --- If Web3 can't solve this problem, then it's pointless, honestly --- The most incredible thing is that some people haven't seen through the platform's intentions; serves them right --- Algorithmic discrimination has no regulation, and this is normal now

View OriginalReply0

notSatoshi1971

· 01-03 07:31

Algorithmic "kill the familiar," this wave is working on a psychological level --- Damn, this logic is so heartbreaking, the hungrier you are, the more they exploit you --- Web3 might be the only way to solve this problem --- Platforms are just vampires; data rights are in their hands, and we are just leeks --- People doing order刷单 late at night are actually the ones getting slaughtered, this is truly incredible --- Transparency mechanisms sound great, but in reality, who would really delegate authority? --- One word: bad. Two words: really bad --- Centralized platforms are all the same trick, no surprise there --- The higher the dependence, the lower the commission? Then might as well just lie flat --- Is decentralization reliable, or is it just another trap to cut the leeks?

View OriginalReply0