Gains Network is valued at 6x revenue, and GMX is also at 10x revenue, with both projects maintaining quarterly revenues of around $3 million. However, their mechanisms differ significantly—GNS burned 1 million tokens over 40 days last month as part of a deflationary strategy; in contrast, GMX continues to inflate. In terms of project scale, a $30.8 million market cap has processed over $10 billion in cumulative trading volume, supporting 290+ trading pairs, and has developed independently without VC backing. This data combination is quite interesting: the market has ample liquidity and ecosystem depth, yet it seems the market has not fully absorbed this value system. The choice of token economics often determines the expectations of long-term holders—deflationary mechanisms are generally more favored by the market, but this is not fully reflected in the valuation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVictim
· 4h ago
Is it really that intense to burn 1 million tokens in a month of deflation? No wonder GNS is more resilient than GMX... But with a market cap of only 300 million and handling 10 billion in transactions, who has truly understood this logic?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfit
· 16h ago
Wow, GNS burns a million tokens per month? The deflationary strength is quite intense. Why is the valuation still so low?
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxAddict
· 17h ago
Deflationary measures might not necessarily save the situation; the key still depends on whether trading volume can be maintained.
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCritic
· 17h ago
Is deflation really that attractive? I saw that GNS had a pretty aggressive burn, with a million tokens destroyed in 40 days... but the valuation didn't increase. Doesn't that just show that the market simply doesn't buy into this? On the other hand, GMX, despite inflation, has stable cash flow sitting there, which makes it seem more reliable.
Gains Network is valued at 6x revenue, and GMX is also at 10x revenue, with both projects maintaining quarterly revenues of around $3 million. However, their mechanisms differ significantly—GNS burned 1 million tokens over 40 days last month as part of a deflationary strategy; in contrast, GMX continues to inflate. In terms of project scale, a $30.8 million market cap has processed over $10 billion in cumulative trading volume, supporting 290+ trading pairs, and has developed independently without VC backing. This data combination is quite interesting: the market has ample liquidity and ecosystem depth, yet it seems the market has not fully absorbed this value system. The choice of token economics often determines the expectations of long-term holders—deflationary mechanisms are generally more favored by the market, but this is not fully reflected in the valuation.