At the time, ideas were flowing rapidly, and I didn't bother to record all the sources of inspiration when creating these NFTs. I stored all my main NFT collections on a local hard drive as the primary material library, then downloaded 10-20 reference images from Google, Twitter, and the public domain. Based on these materials, I generated 5 to 20 different variants. This workflow allowed me to quickly iterate and produce creative works with distinct differences, but in hindsight, I realize I can't quite remember the origins of some of the detailed designs.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiPlaybook
· 22h ago
Honestly, this is a typical case of "sweeping the wool first and settling the bill later" [dog head]. Using local hard drives as a material library, downloading a bunch from Google, generating variants one after another, and finally losing track of the sources — our on-chain data is also created this way.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodler
· 01-05 19:32
Damn, isn't this just a fancy way of saying "I forgot who I copied"?
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 01-04 03:40
Haha, this kind of operation is a typical "Monday morning quarterback." At the time, there was no way to think about regret now.
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 01-03 21:02
Haha, this is the typical creative flow fast-forward mode. Only when it's settled do you realize... the source? What source?
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 01-02 23:58
Haha, isn't this the classic "creative process vs compliance" eternal contradiction? The price of speed is that traceability can easily fall behind...
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugee
· 01-02 23:58
I get this workflow; rapid iteration and delivery are no problem. It's just the material sourcing part... it's a bit sus.
View OriginalReply0
not_your_keys
· 01-02 23:56
Ha, that's why so many NFTs are now being argued over for originality.
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuy
· 01-02 23:56
Ha, so that's the old trick of "inspiration strikes and I forget to record it," I've been through that too...
---
Quickly generating variants sounds great, but then you regret not recording the source clearly afterward. I understand that feeling.
---
So now it's difficult to deal with copyright issues?
---
Storing materials on a local hard drive is a good habit, but it can make it easy to get confused about the source of reference images.
---
This workflow sounds very efficient, but it also carries quite a bit of risk...
---
Generating variants is indeed fast, but transparency is definitely a pitfall.
---
If I had known earlier, I should have made a table to record it. Now it's too late to regret.
---
Google and Twitter images mixed together, and it's hard to trace back to the original source.
---
The cost of creative bursts is like this—there are gains and losses.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 01-02 23:54
Bro, this health factor has been flashing red for a long time... No record of the source? From a risk control perspective, this is a sign of systemic risk, the first domino.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeaker
· 01-02 23:52
Hi, I get this workflow, but aren't you worried about getting exposed later if you do this...
At the time, ideas were flowing rapidly, and I didn't bother to record all the sources of inspiration when creating these NFTs. I stored all my main NFT collections on a local hard drive as the primary material library, then downloaded 10-20 reference images from Google, Twitter, and the public domain. Based on these materials, I generated 5 to 20 different variants. This workflow allowed me to quickly iterate and produce creative works with distinct differences, but in hindsight, I realize I can't quite remember the origins of some of the detailed designs.