Here's a thought that might shape the next 25 years: in 2050, nobody will care much about what artificial intelligence can accomplish—the real battle will be over who controls the choices it makes. The technical capability part? That's almost a non-issue by then. What matters is governance, accountability, and whose interests get baked into the systems we build today.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleWatcher
· 01-04 10:32
Basically, it's a game of power. Technology can be figured out sooner or later; the key is who holds the remote control.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnon
· 01-02 23:55
Well said, the AI war in 2050 will really be a game of power, with technology taking a backseat.
View OriginalReply0
RetroHodler91
· 01-02 23:55
Well said, technology itself has long ceased to be a bottleneck; the key issue is who holds the knife.
View OriginalReply0
TideReceder
· 01-02 23:53
That's right, technology itself isn't valuable; the distribution of power is the core.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 01-02 23:37
The ROI of governance rights allocation is indeed an underestimated asset.
Here's a thought that might shape the next 25 years: in 2050, nobody will care much about what artificial intelligence can accomplish—the real battle will be over who controls the choices it makes. The technical capability part? That's almost a non-issue by then. What matters is governance, accountability, and whose interests get baked into the systems we build today.