About on-chain reinsurance, let's talk about it this year.
Real-world asset tokenization(RWA) performed remarkably in 2025, with a clear growth trend. On-chain reinsurance involves many aspects—how to handle fund custody, compliance adherence, deposit structure setup—all essential topics that can't be avoided.
Starting with the regulated framework: capital flows must comply with reinsurance regulatory requirements, involving licensed institutions. This is fundamental but crucial information.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProbablyNothing
· 23h ago
RWA has been popular for so long, why still use compliance as a shield?
---
On-chain reinsurance sounds impressive, but who will fill the gaps in custody and compliance?
---
It's both licensing agencies and capital flows; it still feels like the old approach.
---
Now everything has to be "regulated," isn't this just traditional finance in a new disguise?
---
To be honest, the rapid growth of RWA is impressive, but can this compliance system really work?
---
Fund custody, deposit structures, oh my, how long will these details be scrutinized?
---
With licensing agencies involved, what about the freedom on the chain? Isn't that just a waste?
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 01-02 21:51
Is on-chain reinsurance really that complicated? It feels like just moving the traditional setup onto the blockchain.
RWA is indeed hot right now, but who guarantees compliance?
Custody, compliance, structure... sounds good in theory, but what about in practice?
With both regulation and licensing involved, isn't that still a centralized activity?
It's already 2025, and we're still discussing infrastructure. Isn't the progress a bit slow?
As long as capital flows meet the requirements, why does it have to be so complicated?
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 01-02 21:43
ngl the compliance stuff is just... it's gonna be another layer of bridge fees waiting to happen, mark my words
Reply0
ZenZKPlayer
· 01-02 21:31
Compliance is easy to talk about but really exhausting to implement. Just thinking about it gives me a headache.
After RWA became popular, everything needs to be on-chain, but how many truly understand the custody process?
On-chain reinsurance? Sounds impressive, but in reality, it still relies on traditional institutions for endorsement.
This round is all about hype, with a bunch of projects waiting to cut the leeks.
Is it enough for capital flows to meet the requirements? Ha, reality is far from that simple.
Involving licensing agencies sounds safe, but who will bear the costs?
The growth of RWA is exciting, but I'm just worried it might be another cycle bubble.
About on-chain reinsurance, let's talk about it this year.
Real-world asset tokenization(RWA) performed remarkably in 2025, with a clear growth trend. On-chain reinsurance involves many aspects—how to handle fund custody, compliance adherence, deposit structure setup—all essential topics that can't be avoided.
Starting with the regulated framework: capital flows must comply with reinsurance regulatory requirements, involving licensed institutions. This is fundamental but crucial information.