2026-01-02 19:26:09

The Collateral token has soared to a valuation of 90M, but this RWA startup project has serious functional issues, and its actual performance is disappointing. In contrast, a platform focused on mineral assets, with a valuation of only 300K, is becoming a gathering place for crypto users — this difference is quite interesting. The imbalance between project quality and market potential is worth cautioning against. Before more signals emerge, I choose to stay on the sidelines. Some things don't seem quite right, and the market's pricing logic needs to be re-evaluated.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HappyToBeDumped

· 9h ago

90M valuation and this? Can't even run the features and still going up... This market is really the ultimate contrarian indicator.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 9h ago

A $90M valuation but it's just an empty shell, that's outrageous. The one worth $300K actually has real users. Just think about this pricing logic... I really can't understand it.

View OriginalReply0

ChainChef

· 9h ago

ngl the recipe here is totally half-baked... 90M valuation for a project that can't even cook properly? meanwhile the 300K mineral play is actually seasoning the market right. that's not just a gap, that's the whole kitchen being on fire tbh

Reply0

pvt_key_collector