In early 2026, the crypto world no longer relies on luck and reckless buying to make money. The real question facing investors is: among over 42 million tokens on the market, which ones are worth investing in? This is completely different from the bull runs of 2017 and 2021, when everything seemed to rise. Now, the market is relatively rational, with increasing gaps between good and bad projects. It's time to test your judgment.
How can you find truly promising projects among the copycat coins? The key is to establish your own evaluation system and avoid following the herd blindly. Consider these aspects:
**First, look at technology and innovation.** What problem is the project solving? Is it a genuine need or just pseudo-innovation? For example, in the AI + Crypto space, the core focus is on solving bottlenecks related to computing power, data, and model ownership. Privacy technologies like zero-knowledge proofs are becoming increasingly mature, enabling the transformation of isolated Web2 data into verifiable assets on Web3, opening new application doors. Projects with solid technical foundations are generally more reliable.
**Second, evaluate the team.** Who is working on this? Do they have successful experience in related fields? The credibility of anonymous teams versus public teams is very different. Also, check if the code repositories are active; active repositories reflect the team's execution capability.
**Finally, consider tokenomics.** Is the token distribution reasonable? Is it controlled by a few people? Can long-term holders and ecosystem contributors benefit from it? These details determine how far the project can go.
Don't rush to chase hot topics; first master this evaluation framework. It’s the right approach to diversify beyond just holding Bitcoin.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunter007
· 3h ago
That's right. Relying solely on stubbornness has long been eliminated. Now, it's really necessary to have your own strategy.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 3h ago
There's nothing wrong with that, but the reality is that most people can't stick to this framework at all and still follow the hot trends.
View OriginalReply0
GasGoblin
· 3h ago
That's right, now it really comes down to judgment. Who the hell can tell the difference among 42 million coins?
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurker
· 3h ago
It's the same old story, nice words but only a few can really execute?
---
420 million tokens, I really want to see who can get this evaluation system right
---
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed the right direction, but among the projects being hyped now, there are very few with real implementation
---
I agree on transparency in teams; I basically pass on anonymous teams
---
Token economics is the most easily overlooked part; most people only look at the price increase and ignore distribution
---
Compared to framework discussions, it's more practical to focus on projects with frequent code commits
---
Making money in 2017 was really easy, anyone could do it. Now that things are more serious, it's become harder
---
I don't follow the trend to gamble, but 90% of those entering are still driven by hot topics and emotions
---
AI+Crypto has a good outlook, but I'm worried it will become just another concept to cash out on
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 4h ago
It's the same theory again, sounds good in words but how many actually use it... I think 90% are still just gambling.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMelonWatcher
· 4h ago
No problem with what you're saying, now it's indeed time to have a systematic perspective.
Bro, this framework summary is clear—technology, team, tokenomics—I agree with all of it, but the problem is that most retail investors simply can't understand the codebase.
Back in 2017, any coin could double in value; now you really have to put in the effort to research, it's exhausting.
I have deep experience with anonymous teams; I've stepped on too many pitfalls...
Zero-knowledge proofs definitely have potential, but you need to find projects that are truly practical.
Honestly, it feels like trying to find a needle in a haystack with 42 million types of tokens; relying solely on evaluation systems is too idealistic.
Bitcoin is still more stable; for others, you need to think it through yourself.
In early 2026, the crypto world no longer relies on luck and reckless buying to make money. The real question facing investors is: among over 42 million tokens on the market, which ones are worth investing in? This is completely different from the bull runs of 2017 and 2021, when everything seemed to rise. Now, the market is relatively rational, with increasing gaps between good and bad projects. It's time to test your judgment.
How can you find truly promising projects among the copycat coins? The key is to establish your own evaluation system and avoid following the herd blindly. Consider these aspects:
**First, look at technology and innovation.** What problem is the project solving? Is it a genuine need or just pseudo-innovation? For example, in the AI + Crypto space, the core focus is on solving bottlenecks related to computing power, data, and model ownership. Privacy technologies like zero-knowledge proofs are becoming increasingly mature, enabling the transformation of isolated Web2 data into verifiable assets on Web3, opening new application doors. Projects with solid technical foundations are generally more reliable.
**Second, evaluate the team.** Who is working on this? Do they have successful experience in related fields? The credibility of anonymous teams versus public teams is very different. Also, check if the code repositories are active; active repositories reflect the team's execution capability.
**Finally, consider tokenomics.** Is the token distribution reasonable? Is it controlled by a few people? Can long-term holders and ecosystem contributors benefit from it? These details determine how far the project can go.
Don't rush to chase hot topics; first master this evaluation framework. It’s the right approach to diversify beyond just holding Bitcoin.