2026-01-02 17:22:11

From 2,100 to 75,000, in less than two months.

It sounds like a fairy tale, but it actually happened. No fancy technical indicators, no study of candlestick patterns, not even using basic moving averages — it sounds unreliable, but it turned out to be more effective.

People around me who follow trends have either switched to full-time trading or even replaced their cars and houses. This makes one start to think: what is the true way to make money?

Rather than claiming there’s a secret, it’s more straightforward to say that the method is key:

**First: Discipline in Holding**
When the market is falling, ignore it; when the market is sideways, take a break; only consider reducing positions during an uptrend. Limit each trade to within 30% of the account. No swing trading, no frequent interventions — just hold tightly.

**Second: Trend Selection**
Only look for directions among mainstream coins, and wait until the trend is clear before participating. Abandon small coins and short-term volatility opportunities. A genuine big trend yields far more than dozens of small trades.

**Third: Capital Allocation**
Divide initial funds into five tiers, and only use one or two at a time. Buying the dip during a crash is about trend adjustment, not blindly bottom-fishing. This conservative approach actually helps the account last longer.

Ultimately, winning isn’t about analyzing the market accurately, but about firm execution.

Many people in the market are eloquent about technical analysis and draw beautiful charts, but in the end, they fall prey to emotions and human nature. True winners are often not the smartest, but those who can stick to the rules and are not swayed by short-term fluctuations.

From 2,100 to 75,000, it may seem lucky, but fundamentally it’s the power of compound interest working continuously.

Someone once said: "Just holding on foolishly, I actually made back the money I lost from frequent trades before."

If you find that the smarter you are, the more you lose, and repeatedly adjusting strategies still puts you on the brink of bankruptcy — maybe it’s time to consider a different approach.

There’s a saying: The best investment is understanding yourself, which is more important than understanding the market.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityWitch

· 7h ago

nah the real alchemy here is just... not touching your portfolio lmao. discipline beats every chart ever drawn fr

Reply0

CryptoDouble-O-Seven

· 7h ago

It sounds a bit far-fetched, but I believe it... mainly depends on whether you're lucky or not.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaLeaker

· 7h ago

Basically, it's just about not messing around; holding on is better than anything else. --- This thing sounds simple, but it takes a lot of mental resilience to do. --- Damn, can it really go from 2100 to 75,000? No way it's just hype. --- The main thing is to follow the rules; most people die because of frequent trading. --- Got it, it's about betting on the right trend once, then holding tight without letting go. --- The last sentence is brilliant: understanding yourself is indeed more important than analyzing charts. --- This logic works in any cycle. No more nonsense, this is how I play now. --- It doesn't seem like any advanced technique, but it turns out to be the most profitable—human paradox.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractDiver

· 7h ago

Looking at these numbers, it's a bit outrageous, but the lazy strategy seems to make more money than those who watch the market every day. Honestly, I've heard this theory more than once, but the key is having the mental resilience to withstand it. 35 times in two months? I believe this number, but the premise is to catch the right trend, right? I agree that not trading frequently is good, but how do you know when the trend is truly clear? Dividing funds into five tiers sounds safe, but how many people can actually do that in practice?

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 7h ago

Basically, it's just lying flat to make money, I believe it. It sounds simple, but there are very few people who can really resist moving, and I can't either. Controlling 30% of the position is indeed ruthless, but during a sharp decline, re-adding positions is easy to talk about but really tests your mental state. Holding onto mainstream coins and abandoning small coins—I'm okay with this logic, but I still get itchy and want to try those tenfold coins. The real difficulty isn't the methodology; it's being able to endure the loneliness.

View OriginalReply0

OffchainWinner

· 7h ago

Basically, just hold steady and be honest. This group of people who study K-line charts every day are the ones losing money. Staying calm really works better than any technical analysis. I've seen people who watch the market daily buy the dip and end up getting cut. Wow, more than thirty times in two months? That takes incredible mental strength. I would have sold halfway through. It feels like this method sounds easy to say, but sticking with it is probably hell... Being not too smart is often the smartest trading strategy. Overthinking can lead to quick losses.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 7h ago

I broke down this data model... 30% single-transaction limit, five-tier fund allocation, only dealing with mainstream coins. To put it simply, it's a straightforward position management system. It may sound like it lacks technical complexity, but when calculated, the compound interest efficiency is indeed impressive. From 2,100 to 75,000, viewed from another angle, it's a matter of risk-adjusted capital utilization. However, this logic is based on the premise of a clear trend— the question is, how much does it cost to judge the trend itself? How to interpret on-chain data? This part wasn't mentioned.

View OriginalReply0