2026-01-02 16:25:04

Some token projects have exposed a stubborn problem in the crypto market: highly packaged, extremely low-cost projects that create a buzz. These projects often have several obvious characteristics.

First, the identity of the project team is unclear. The founding team is secretive, with no verifiable background information, which is a red flag. Second, hype rotation. They start with artistic concepts, then switch to charitable narratives when sales slow down, always looking for new stories to attract attention. Third, false prosperity. Investors see a large number of accounts shouting buy orders, claiming astonishing gains, but the actual trading volume and holder收益情况 don't match up.

Ultimately, these are zero-cost operated pump-and-dump tokens. They lack real applications, technical accumulation, and sustainable value support. When the hype runs out, the bagholders become the ones who take the last hit.

In this market, it's better to be cautious than to be impulsive. Ask more questions: Who is the project team? What is the product? Where do the profits come from? Projects that can't answer these questions, no matter how fancy their packaging, should be approached with caution.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketGardener

· 4h ago

Projects with ambiguous identities should have been phased out long ago. That bit of hype can fool people temporarily but not forever.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerAirdrop

· 5h ago

It's the same pattern again—blurry identities + story rotation, a classic three-step scam to fleece investors. --- The trading volume doesn't match the hype, one look and it's obviously a fake boom. I've seen too many projects like this. --- You can see through it by asking three questions, but unfortunately most people don't ask at all. --- The most ridiculous thing about zero-cost air coins is that some people actually believe it. I'm truly speechless. --- Projects that the team doesn't even dare to show their faces on, and you still dare to get on board? --- The last one to step in is just asking for it. If it happens once or twice, you can say they didn't know, but doing it every time is really something. --- That switch in narrative is brilliant—this wave is about art, the next wave is charity, and what will they come up with after that?

View OriginalReply0

VibesOverCharts

· 5h ago

It's the same old trick, if the team is anonymous, it should be a straight pass. --- I laughed at the hype rotation part; I've seen too many of these tricks. --- Basically, it's still information asymmetry; retail investors always end up holding the bag last. --- I will block anyone who can't answer these three questions. --- It's really obvious when the trading volume doesn't match the order volume; it's fake at a glance. --- Zero-cost operation, to put it nicely, is just pure rug risk. --- Being detail-oriented is a hundred times more important than being impulsive.

View OriginalReply0

LeverageAddict

· 5h ago

Blurred identities, story rotations, false prosperity—honestly, these tricks are completely worn out. --- It's the same old scam coin routine; you still need to ask a few more whys. --- Taking the final baton—that's a casino. --- Project teams hide and seek, then I hide your coins too. --- False prosperity is the best way to deceive newcomers; if the trading volume doesn't match, you better run. --- Being cautious is better than being impulsive, but most people are greedy at heart. --- No matter how fancy the packaging, if there’s no application, it’s useless. I've seen too many. --- Zero-cost operation? That’s when you should directly ask the founders. --- Once the hype is over, it’s cold; do you not understand where the returns come from?

View OriginalReply0

FundingMartyr

· 5h ago

Anonymous team playing hide and seek, they should just run now --- Switching gimmicks one after another, basically it means there's nothing --- I've seen plenty of false prosperity, with countless signal trading accounts --- Can a zero-cost meme coin still be pumped up? Luckily, people's greed is to blame --- If you can't answer three questions, just pass directly, don't give scammers a chance --- No matter how exquisite the flowery words are, they can't save projects without products --- The ones who take over last are always the worst; this lesson must be learned --- Project teams avoiding discussing their identity is just guilt; there's nothing more to say --- It's unclear where the profits come from; I never touch such schemes

View OriginalReply0

ForkPrince

· 5h ago

Another wave of rug pulls, nothing new. Obscure identities, rotating stories, fake trading volume... really, I can memorize this routine. The problem is that some people still fall for it, so annoying. When the team hides, they should just run away. Let's not bother with projects like this.

View OriginalReply0