2026-01-02 16:23:48

Recently, SHIB's burn activity has caused some buzz. The 24-hour burn volume plummeted from 173 million tokens to 3.78 million tokens, a decrease of 97.83%, marking the first decline since 2026. It appears that the daily burn rate has significantly slowed down, but there is a twist — the weekly burn rate has surged over 500%, while the total supply continues to shrink.

This meme coin had considerable momentum at the beginning of the year. The price surged notably on January 1st and has been steadily rising since then. Currently, the trading price is around $0.00000752, with a 24-hour trading volume reaching $134 million. Behind this dramatic fluctuation in burn volume, is it a shift in market sentiment or a phased adjustment of the burn mechanism? This signal is worth players' careful consideration.

SHIB0,05%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PonziDetector

· 01-04 01:47

Why is the destruction data so volatile? It feels like they're just playing tricks again. A 500% increase in weekly destruction sounds unbelievable.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-02 16:53

The destruction data is so wild, it feels like someone is playing tricks. A 500% surge in daily destruction—what does that even mean? The logic doesn't add up. SHIB is still that SHIB; it all depends on who is still buying the dip.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecorder

· 01-02 16:53

Why are the destruction data so volatile? Feels like a smoke screen. The weekly destruction skyrocketed by 500%, which makes it even more suspicious. Is this really good news or just a prelude to cutting the leeks? There's a lot of behind-the-scenes manipulation behind SHIB's recent destruction mechanism adjustment. It depends on who is controlling the market. At the price level of 0.00000752, it feels like a setup.

View OriginalReply0

Layer3Dreamer

· 01-02 16:53

theoretically speaking, that 97.83% cliff in daily burns is giving me recursive state verification vibes... like someone hit pause on the burn mechanism mid-cycle? the weekly surge offsetting it though... that's interesting from a cross-rollup perspective if we think about batching logic ngl the math here feels like watching a poorly designed bridge function execute out of order lol

Reply0

StillBuyingTheDip

· 01-02 16:50

The repeated destruction data suggests someone is playing tricks. A 500% surge in weekly destruction? Something's off. Is this a big move or just harvesting profits? SHIB is like this—celebrating today, slipping tomorrow. Anyway, I'm still bottom-fishing. Is this wave due to a mechanism adjustment or someone manipulating the rhythm? We need to see what happens next. Just looking at the trading volume of 134 million, the hype is still there, but with such impulsive destruction, I feel a bit uneasy.

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 01-02 16:46

The data on destruction has plummeted; isn't someone manipulating the rhythm?

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 01-02 16:43

Wait, a 97.83% drop, this data is a bit outrageous. Needs clarification—daily burns drop sharply, but weekly burns instead surge by 500%? Logically, that doesn't add up. I can believe in the phased adjustment of the burn mechanism, but whether this sharp fluctuation is due to technical changes or pure marketing hype remains to be further verified. Let's see if the upcoming reduced total supply can support the price; meme coins ultimately depend on sentiment. From an engineering perspective, such bizarre burn data warrants checking whether any burn contract parameters have been changed. There are some interesting findings, but to be honest, SHIB's recent moves seem a bit like they're coordinating with a narrative, so I don't want to jump to conclusions just yet.

View OriginalReply0

BlockTalk

· 01-02 16:42

Destroying data is so ridiculous. Is the weekly destruction surge of 500% real or fake? It feels like a numbers game.

View OriginalReply0