After 100+ investments and probably 500-1000 founders pitching me, I can say this with confidence:
Tokenomics rarely tell you anything meaningful about the project.
But they tell you a lot about the founder.
• High FDV → ego & greed issues • Dual equity/token structures → sees crypto as a cash grab • Over-engineered vesting → low confidence in the product • Massive airdrops → no real GTM, hype over longevity • Over-engineered tokenomics → no product
I could go on with this list forever, but you get the point.
Well-designed tokenomics are nice to have, but almost never the reason a project succeeds.
A great product people actually want can survive terrible tokenomics.
The best tokenomics in the world will never save a useless product.
Unfortunately most founders confuse the two.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
After 100+ investments and probably 500-1000 founders pitching me, I can say this with confidence:
Tokenomics rarely tell you anything meaningful about the project.
But they tell you a lot about the founder.
• High FDV → ego & greed issues
• Dual equity/token structures → sees crypto as a cash grab
• Over-engineered vesting → low confidence in the product
• Massive airdrops → no real GTM, hype over longevity
• Over-engineered tokenomics → no product
I could go on with this list forever, but you get the point.
Well-designed tokenomics are nice to have, but almost never the reason a project succeeds.
A great product people actually want can survive terrible tokenomics.
The best tokenomics in the world will never save a useless product.
Unfortunately most founders confuse the two.