Having reviewed hundreds of trading documents repeatedly, I finally found the common weakness that beginners most frequently make.



Among friends who have just entered the crypto space, many have trading records that look quite impressive—win rates easily exceeding 70%, like a victorious general. But if you look at their account balances, they are gradually shrinking. In contrast, some veterans have win rates even below 40%, yet their account curves are steadily upward.

The answer to this paradox lies in a number: the risk-reward ratio. That is, the ratio between how much you earn when you win and how much you lose when you fail. This thing is the real indicator that determines whether you can survive in the market and continue making money.

**What exactly is the risk-reward ratio**

Let's take a concrete example. Suppose you use 1 million in capital to make 10 trades: 4 successful trades, earning 150,000, 250,000, 350,000, and 450,000 respectively; 6 unsuccessful trades, each losing an average of 111,700.

Calculating the numbers: total profit is 1.2 million, averaging 300,000 per winning trade; total loss is 670,000, averaging 111,700 per losing trade. So, the risk-reward ratio is 300,000 ÷ 111,700 ≈ 2.69.

What does this mean? Even if your win rate is only 40%, as long as you maintain a risk-reward ratio of around 2.7 in the long run, your account can still grow steadily. On the other hand, those with a 70% win rate but continuous losses are failing because their risk-reward ratio is completely reversed.

**Most people get this backwards**

In actual trading, a common magical move is: when losing, stubbornly hold on and refuse to cut losses; when winning, become impatient and hurriedly take profits. The final result is—average losses far exceed average gains. No matter how high your win rate is, it won't save you.

**My own execution rule**

I set a strict rule for myself: before any trade, I must calculate the preset risk-reward ratio. If it's less than 2:1, I won't open the position.

How do I do this specifically? For example, I see ZEC facing resistance in the 510-530 range, planning to build a position around 520—then I will set my target price and stop-loss in advance, ensuring that when I profit, I earn twice the amount I risk. Only then is it worth taking the risk.
ZEC-2,2%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WinterWarmthCatvip
· 47m ago
I've understood this profit and loss ratio thing a long time ago; it's just that stop-loss is too difficult.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 13h ago
Profit and loss ratio is indeed the core, but I care more about—where do the data for those high win rate accounts come from? Can on-chain addresses be traced? I've seen too many "beautiful screenshots" that are actually just the cycle of capital pools recovering funds and harvesting retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuruvip
· 13h ago
Wow, so that's the reason I've been losing money all along... A high win rate is useless I always run as soon as I make a profit, and stubbornly hold on when I lose, no wonder my account is bleeding This risk-reward ratio is the real core; I had it completely backwards before
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVotervip
· 13h ago
Really, I've seen friends with a 70% win rate, but in the end, they still get educated by the market. The risk-reward ratio is too crucial, and most people are doing the opposite.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)