2026-01-02 14:25:37

🚨 EVM Multi-Chain Wallets Concentrated Theft Cases Surge

According to on-chain security analysts, recently a large number of wallets within the EVM ecosystem have been subjected to mass theft attacks. The attackers' methods are quite "clever" — they steal less than $2,000 each time, making it easier to evade detection systems.

So far, the total losses suffered by victims have exceeded $107,000, and this number continues to rise.

The scope of this wave of attacks and the number of affected wallets clearly indicate that this is not an isolated case. Users need to immediately review their wallet authorization status, active contract interaction records, and whether they have encountered suspicious phishing links. Multi-chain users should pay special attention — permission leaks during cross-chain interactions are often the main vulnerability.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkItAllDay

· 5h ago

That scared me to death, quickly check the wallet authorization...

View OriginalReply0

BakedCatFanboy

· 5h ago

Damn, they're using the same trick again? Small-scale repeated thefts are really clever; defenses are overwhelmed and can't keep up.

View OriginalReply0

PumpStrategist

· 5h ago

Not every time under $2000 to evade detection? I’ve seen this trick before last year, it was the same way then, and they still dare to repeat it now—what does that say about your own issues? --- Cross-chain interaction permission leaks, in plain terms, are caused by those who go all-in not even checking the authorization list, not even reading MetaMask warnings. --- $107,000 is still rising? Distribution of chips shows this attack was clearly organized, not like an individual hacker. --- Check the contract interaction records; you’re likely to find that suspicious token contract. I bet $5 it’s a fake coin airdrop trap. --- Quite interesting—multi-chain users have become the hardest hit. Looks like everyone’s brains are waterlogged when cross-chain, permissions are never revoked once granted. --- Only stealing $2000 each time? I get this logic—probability strategy. Small, frequent amounts indeed have a lower risk factor than large single transactions. --- Honestly, this should have been cleaned up long ago. These low-level, repetitive tricks are played year after year, and the victims’ awakening speed really can’t keep up with the iteration of scams.

View OriginalReply0