2026-01-02 14:23:30

2025 will be a watershed year for the Polkadot ecosystem. The entire project is undergoing a strategic shift — no longer solely emphasizing the sophistication of the underlying protocol, but focusing on product usability and developer experience. The driving force behind this is reflected in the reallocation of resources among Parity, the Web3 Foundation, and OpenGov.

The underlying infrastructure has finally matured. The key modules of Polkadot 2.0 are gradually coming into place, with the Hub becoming the main entry point for developers, and various core functions continuously converging into the Hub. In other words, the capabilities previously scattered across different parachains are now becoming highly centralized, significantly reducing the integration costs for developers.

What’s even more noteworthy is the Revive component. Many people understand it as a single tool, which is not entirely accurate. In practical application terms, Revive is the smart contract execution stack on the Hub, employing a dual virtual machine design: one is PolkaVM (a high-performance execution environment based on RISC-V architecture), and the other is REVM (a fully Ethereum-compatible execution environment). The brilliance of this design lies in its ability to leverage Polkadot’s inherent performance advantages while seamlessly integrating developers and applications from the Ethereum ecosystem. Large-scale deployment of applications is no longer just theoretical but a tangible technological possibility.

Meanwhile, the PaperMoon team’s 2025 mission is clear — to make Polkadot more user-friendly. Their main focus is on developer relations and documentation system development: ensuring that documentation keeps pace with feature iterations and continuously refining UI/UX experiences. These seemingly fundamental tasks determine the onboarding difficulty for new developers and the overall expansion speed of the ecosystem.

DOT-0,56%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StakeOrRegret

· 3h ago

Revive's dual virtual machine design is truly brilliant, enabling Ethereum developers to migrate seamlessly. Polkadot finally understands what lowering the barrier really means.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaSunglasses

· 10h ago

Wow, someone finally explained Revive clearly. The dual virtual machine architecture design is really impressive.

View OriginalReply0

PositionPhobia

· 23h ago

Honestly, I’m optimistic about Polkadot’s shift this time. It’s not about technical details, but I finally realize a problem—no matter how advanced a protocol is, if no one uses it, it’s pointless. The dual virtual machines are a bit of a breakthrough; being compatible with the Ethereum ecosystem is indeed a key advantage. I just worry that the execution layer might mess up again, as there have been too many promises before. --- The hub’s aggregation capability sounds good, but I wonder if it will turn into another centralized thing. What about the spirit of decentralization? --- Small things like documentation and UX are the easiest to overlook, but they actually determine life or death. We’ll see if PaperMoon is truly dedicated. --- Wow, from hyping the underlying layer to promoting usability, this shift is a bit rapid. What about those so-called "revolutionary" features? They’re not even mentioned anymore? --- Revive needs to truly enable seamless migration for Ethereum developers to be successful. But I’ll wait and see—hopefully it’s not just another PPT project.

View OriginalReply0

LongTermDreamer

· 01-02 14:51

Hmm, this time it might really be different. Three years ago, we talked about usability, and now it's finally serious. Revive's dual virtual machine design—I have to admit, it's quite bold. Ethereum developers can jump on board directly without changing code? That's a brilliant idea. Documentation is easy to say but the hardest to do. Let's see if PaperMoon can truly keep up with the iteration speed. The move to concentrate capabilities in the Hub—if the underlying technology wasn't truly mature, it wouldn't be feasible at all.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 01-02 14:49

Good morning, 2 a.m. Revive's virtual machine design is indeed impressive, but the question is—who will ensure that new arbitrage opportunities won't appear in the ecosystem? A centralized Hub might actually be more prone to becoming a liquidity trap, and at that point, small developers will still have to queue up and fight over gas fees. No matter how well-designed the documentation or how smooth the UX, ultimately, market education is necessary. Time cost is something that can't be captured in documentation.

View OriginalReply0

mev_me_maybe

· 01-02 14:44

Someone finally explained these details clearly. Revive's dual virtual machine design is indeed crazy, capable of capturing the dividends of both Polkadot and Ethereum simultaneously. However, regarding the documentation system... we need to see if PaperMoon can really keep up. In the past, the update speed of Polkadot's documentation was indeed concerning. The centralized route of the Hub is the right move; reducing developer integration costs will improve the user experience. To put it simply, it still depends on whether a killer app will emerge this year. Having an elegant technical architecture alone is not enough. If this round of shift succeeds, Polkadot truly has a chance to turn things around.

View OriginalReply0

DaoDeveloper

· 01-02 14:38

ngl the dual-vm architecture is actually genius from a composability standpoint — finally bridging that evm/polkadot gap without the usual tradeoffs

Reply0