It's quite normal for everyone to feel pleased with the progress of regulation over the years. The entire ecosystem has a clear understanding of the risks, and regulatory authorities are also doing their homework. Instead of over-interpreting every statement or scrutinizing each other, it's better to discuss practical issues more openly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SoliditySlayer
· 6h ago
Honestly, instead of guessing what regulatory authorities are thinking every day, it's better to focus on doing your work diligently.
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwich
· 6h ago
Well said. Instead of guessing back and forth, it's better to focus on solidifying technology and applications. Being regulator-friendly isn't a bad thing either.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClass
· 7h ago
nah tbh regulatory theater hits different when you've actually studied the '08 crisis playbook. we're basically watching the same "this time we understand systemic risk" speech from 2017 except with more compliance docs. *checks notes* yeah, the pattern recognition doesn't lie here.
Reply0
Anon32942
· 7h ago
The key is real implementation. Talking nicely is useless; it depends on how it is actually regulated.
It's quite normal for everyone to feel pleased with the progress of regulation over the years. The entire ecosystem has a clear understanding of the risks, and regulatory authorities are also doing their homework. Instead of over-interpreting every statement or scrutinizing each other, it's better to discuss practical issues more openly.