Bitcoin has already broken free from the traditional 4-year cycle constraints.
For a long time, the industry has had a consensus on Bitcoin's price movement pattern: experiencing a complete cycle approximately every 4 years—halving events trigger a new rally, followed by a peak, correction, and then entering the next cycle. This pattern has been repeatedly validated across multiple cycles and has become a basis for many investors' strategies.
But now it seems this model is failing. With the deep involvement of institutional capital, the launch of spot ETFs, and the maturation of market structure, Bitcoin's price movements are beginning to diverge from a simple time cycle framework. The market's driving factors are becoming more complex—intertwining macro liquidity, policy expectations, institutional allocation demands, and other multidimensional factors.
What does this mean? Investors need to upgrade their understanding of Bitcoin cycles. Over-reliance on historical cycle points may lead to decision biases. As market rules change, adapting to new analytical frameworks becomes an essential skill.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TrustlessMaximalist
· 8h ago
Another new set of theories? The 4-year cycle has failed. So what's the next cycle, 3 years or 5 years?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 8h ago
Institutional entry, this just got interesting. The 4-year cycle theory is indeed due for retirement. Arbitrage opportunities still exist, but you need to approach them from a different perspective.
Bitcoin has already broken free from the traditional 4-year cycle constraints.
For a long time, the industry has had a consensus on Bitcoin's price movement pattern: experiencing a complete cycle approximately every 4 years—halving events trigger a new rally, followed by a peak, correction, and then entering the next cycle. This pattern has been repeatedly validated across multiple cycles and has become a basis for many investors' strategies.
But now it seems this model is failing. With the deep involvement of institutional capital, the launch of spot ETFs, and the maturation of market structure, Bitcoin's price movements are beginning to diverge from a simple time cycle framework. The market's driving factors are becoming more complex—intertwining macro liquidity, policy expectations, institutional allocation demands, and other multidimensional factors.
What does this mean? Investors need to upgrade their understanding of Bitcoin cycles. Over-reliance on historical cycle points may lead to decision biases. As market rules change, adapting to new analytical frameworks becomes an essential skill.