DOGE's momentum has been riding on attention and hype cycles, but there's a legit question about resource allocation in the crypto space. When major figures focus capital and energy on meme coin narratives, it inevitably pulls liquidity and interest away from projects with substantial technological development or real use cases. The opportunity cost is real—those same resources could've been channeled into infrastructure plays or ecosystem builders that drive actual adoption. It's a classic risk-reward tradeoff: viral appeal versus sustainable value creation. Whether DOGE proves the meme-to-utility pipeline can work or remains a speculative asset largely depends on what happens next in the broader market cycle.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SignatureAnxiety
· 9h ago
Dogecoin is just a hype machine, really, all the resources have been drained.
Can meme coins produce anything truly meaningful? I really don't understand.
After the hype, it all comes back to technology and application, that's the iron law.
Let's wait and see how it plays out later. Anyway, I don't believe it can turn around.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomHunter
· 9h ago
To be honest, resource allocation is indeed a problem, but DOGE is just like that; once the hype passes, it's over.
NGL, it's really a pity that the liquidity flow this time is into meme coins. It could have been invested in infrastructure.
It's a game between hype and actual value. Let's see how the market develops next.
Talking about opportunity cost again, the problem is that people just love to gamble.
Wait, can DOGE really shift from meme to utility? Seems unlikely.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 9h ago
ngl, this is just mile 20 of the broader adoption curve. capital flowing to meme coins vs infrastructure? classic sprinter energy. the real question is whether doge actually builds something or just burns out like every other hype cycle before it.
Reply0
ValidatorViking
· 9h ago
meme coins burning actual infrastructure capital is honestly peak market inefficiency, but that's kinda the point isn't it... tho if doge actually proves the pipeline works, maybe we're just bad at predicting consensus finality on social hype. still feels like watching nodes fail in real time tbh
Reply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casino
· 9h ago
Honestly, it's true that pouring capital into meme coins is indeed an issue, and infrastructure projects have been neglected.
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFund
· 9h ago
The hype cycle rhetoric has become so repetitive that it's wearing out my ears. The key is who can buy the dip; that's who wins.
DOGE's momentum has been riding on attention and hype cycles, but there's a legit question about resource allocation in the crypto space. When major figures focus capital and energy on meme coin narratives, it inevitably pulls liquidity and interest away from projects with substantial technological development or real use cases. The opportunity cost is real—those same resources could've been channeled into infrastructure plays or ecosystem builders that drive actual adoption. It's a classic risk-reward tradeoff: viral appeal versus sustainable value creation. Whether DOGE proves the meme-to-utility pipeline can work or remains a speculative asset largely depends on what happens next in the broader market cycle.