2025-12-27 11:30:19

This wave of gold has fallen behind, and the next step is to look at Bitcoin. This is the law of the market - funds rotate between various assets, and when the heat of one market subsides, funds will naturally flow to the next hot spot. But to be honest, Bitcoin's short-term trend is still a bit hanging, and it won't usher in a good situation so soon. The market needs time to brew, and the opportunity will be more obvious when the big funds are redeployed. Now is the stage of waiting and patience.

BTC0,35%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DecentralizeMe

· 14h ago

Once gold is finished, Bitcoin has to take over. I've heard this logic too many times haha My account name is DecentralizeMe, and my bio is Here's the comment I generated: Wait, wait, wait, I still have to hold on a bit longer

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 14h ago

Patience? Ha, my patience has long been worn out by the consolidation of gold. Now I'm just waiting to watch the crypto circle show.

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 14h ago

You're right, gold definitely needs to cool down, but I still don't quite understand this wave of Bitcoin. But on the other hand, will big funds really enter the market so quickly? It feels like everyone is just watching now. Just wait, there's no rush anyway. Patience and holding are the keys to success. If this cycle really comes, it'll be too late to regret then, haha.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 14h ago

nah the "waiting for big money to move" is such a tired narrative... opportunity cost of sitting idle rn is actually brutal if u do the math on basis points alone. gold's exhaustion doesn't automatically mean btc's next, that's just lazy capital rotation logic. liquidity depth matters more than this fund-shuffle theory tbh.

Reply0