A well-known blogger recently analyzed coins with explosive growth, sparking quite a bit of discussion. It seems to be guiding retail investors, but in fact, it reveals several key aspects of the crypto market quite thoroughly. However, the "opportunities" and "traps" involved require careful discernment. Let's go through them one by one:
**SUI: Signal of Institutional Entry vs. Retail Expectations**
The blogger believes SUI is the focus of a new round of institutional deployment, and this observation has some basis. Bitwise submitted an application for a SUI spot ETF to U.S. regulators, which indeed sends a strong signal—equivalent to traditional financial institutions paving the way for this blockchain. The DEX trading volume within the SUI ecosystem has also surpassed 16 billion, and with new technical roadmaps being implemented one after another, the project is indeed "doing its homework."
But here’s a key issue: the cycle of institutions and the expectations of retail investors are often misaligned. Institutions plan over annual or even longer cycles, while retail investors hope to double their holdings in a few days. Catching the bottom during a correction sounds wonderful, but if your holding period is ten times shorter than that of institutions, you are likely to learn a lesson from market volatility—institutions' "long-term thinking" often exceeds the frequency with which individual investors binge-watch projects.
**ASTER: Imaginative Space of Deflationary Design**
ASTER’s Burndrop destruction mechanism is interesting. Each transaction corresponds to a certain amount of tokens being burned, which theoretically can alleviate long-term selling pressure. It’s similar to a limited release strategy—the scarcer it is, the easier it is to stir up emotions. More attractive is that behind it stands traditional financial giants like SBI Holdings supporting stablecoins, which essentially gives the project a "hard resource endorsement."
However, a purely deflationary mechanism, without real usage scenarios and traffic support, can only look good on paper. The trend of such projects often depends on whether the narrative can continue to attract market attention and whether the fundamentals can truly be realized.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseMortgage
· 7h ago
Institutions paving the way for retail investors to take the bait—haven't we seen this show enough times? SUI and ASTER both look promising, but before actually buying in, you need to think carefully about whether you're the type to hold for half a year or get scared off by the volatility. I just don't believe that many people can truly play according to institutional rhythms.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 7h ago
Institutional annual deployment, retail investors double in a few days—this difference is truly remarkable. Usually, only after being cut do they realize it.
View OriginalReply0
DevChive
· 7h ago
Institutions hold long-term positions while I take short-term ones. Isn't this just self-delusion... Basically, it's the fate of retail investors being the bagholders.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmare
· 7h ago
Institutions plan their strategies annually, while retail investors count their money hourly—this gap is really quite extreme.
Projects that sound appealing but never materialize ultimately end up being lessons learned.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocity
· 7h ago
Institutional planning takes years, while retail investors want to double their investment in a few days. The gap is quite significant.
ASTER's deflationary design sounds good, but without practical use cases, it's just talk on paper.
It's storytelling and coin burning again. In the end, it's still about who can hold on until the last.
SUI's ETF application this time does have some substance, but don't let emotions drive you.
A compelling narrative with practical scenarios as a safety net is the real skill.
A well-known blogger recently analyzed coins with explosive growth, sparking quite a bit of discussion. It seems to be guiding retail investors, but in fact, it reveals several key aspects of the crypto market quite thoroughly. However, the "opportunities" and "traps" involved require careful discernment. Let's go through them one by one:
**SUI: Signal of Institutional Entry vs. Retail Expectations**
The blogger believes SUI is the focus of a new round of institutional deployment, and this observation has some basis. Bitwise submitted an application for a SUI spot ETF to U.S. regulators, which indeed sends a strong signal—equivalent to traditional financial institutions paving the way for this blockchain. The DEX trading volume within the SUI ecosystem has also surpassed 16 billion, and with new technical roadmaps being implemented one after another, the project is indeed "doing its homework."
But here’s a key issue: the cycle of institutions and the expectations of retail investors are often misaligned. Institutions plan over annual or even longer cycles, while retail investors hope to double their holdings in a few days. Catching the bottom during a correction sounds wonderful, but if your holding period is ten times shorter than that of institutions, you are likely to learn a lesson from market volatility—institutions' "long-term thinking" often exceeds the frequency with which individual investors binge-watch projects.
**ASTER: Imaginative Space of Deflationary Design**
ASTER’s Burndrop destruction mechanism is interesting. Each transaction corresponds to a certain amount of tokens being burned, which theoretically can alleviate long-term selling pressure. It’s similar to a limited release strategy—the scarcer it is, the easier it is to stir up emotions. More attractive is that behind it stands traditional financial giants like SBI Holdings supporting stablecoins, which essentially gives the project a "hard resource endorsement."
However, a purely deflationary mechanism, without real usage scenarios and traffic support, can only look good on paper. The trend of such projects often depends on whether the narrative can continue to attract market attention and whether the fundamentals can truly be realized.