The recent market movement of ZEC really aligns with classic technical patterns. After falling from the historical high of 775, a standard downward drive was formed. The segment from 300 to 476 is a correction wave. I identified this as a leading structure at the time and started waiting for an opportunity for wave 2. When the price was around 380, I felt the support was quite solid. After confirming the key level at 371, the rally was initiated.
The current issue is whether this rally is a zigzag rebound or a true impulsive wave. Based on the candlestick patterns, it should be a legitimate impulsive structure. According to the general rules of wave theory, the target for this impulsive move is approximately 1.5 times the length of the previous leading wave.
Based on this logic, there is a very high probability that ZEC will surge to around 600, but there will be several pullbacks to deal with along the way. The most important thing is to control your position size—avoid heavy concentration and stubborn holding. Gradual position building and taking profits are more prudent. The market is ever-changing, so this analysis should only serve as a reference.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProofOfNothing
· 11h ago
Wave theory sounds quite professional, but when the market suddenly changes, it's all useless.
Splitting into batches for building positions is correct, but it's really difficult to execute.
Whether ZEC can break 600 this time mainly depends on Bitcoin's performance.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 11h ago
Wave theory is played really well, but to be honest, brother, I still have some reservations about the 600 target.
Dividing profits in batches is a good point, but I'm just worried that if a retracement happens later, my mindset will be blown.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityJester
· 11h ago
No matter how beautiful the wave theory sounds, it still depends on volume to speak.
600 is a good target, but should I act now? I'm still watching.
That support at 371 is indeed interesting; next time it retests, I'll keep a close eye.
If this wave truly drives the trend, we'll ride the wave to make profits; if it's a fake move, just cut losses immediately—it's that simple.
Gradually entering the market is the most reliable advice; don't go all-in at once.
View OriginalReply0
orphaned_block
· 11h ago
The wave theory veteran is back to precise positioning, and this time the ZEC logic is indeed solid.
600 is a good target, just need to watch out for the pullback and avoid being washed out.
DCA (Dollar Cost Averaging) is definitely more stable; I learned my lesson from last time when I heavily invested.
If this wave really breaks out, it feels like another surge in awareness is coming.
The recent market movement of ZEC really aligns with classic technical patterns. After falling from the historical high of 775, a standard downward drive was formed. The segment from 300 to 476 is a correction wave. I identified this as a leading structure at the time and started waiting for an opportunity for wave 2. When the price was around 380, I felt the support was quite solid. After confirming the key level at 371, the rally was initiated.
The current issue is whether this rally is a zigzag rebound or a true impulsive wave. Based on the candlestick patterns, it should be a legitimate impulsive structure. According to the general rules of wave theory, the target for this impulsive move is approximately 1.5 times the length of the previous leading wave.
Based on this logic, there is a very high probability that ZEC will surge to around 600, but there will be several pullbacks to deal with along the way. The most important thing is to control your position size—avoid heavy concentration and stubborn holding. Gradual position building and taking profits are more prudent. The market is ever-changing, so this analysis should only serve as a reference.