2025-12-27 10:24:19

This position is indeed worth paying attention to. The destruction of 118 million tokens has already been recorded on-chain. From a mechanism design perspective, the supply will only decrease, and scarcity is continuously increasing. After half a year of consolidation, market participants have also largely differentiated, and the chip structure is relatively clear.

What’s even more interesting is the underlying ecological logic. The expansion of payment function scenarios has laid the foundation for the application of the entire asset. This is not just a simple technological innovation but an evolution driven by actual demand.

From the current price position, it is indeed a reasonable accumulation zone. Long-term holders’ strategy at this point is very clear: reduce trading frequency to avoid being disturbed by short-term fluctuations. Let those who frequently chase gains and sell at losses expend their energy; the prudent approach is to hold the position. Opportunities of this level in the market are rare even over ten years. The key is to hold on.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TradingNightmare

· 12-27 10:54

The on-chain destruction mechanism is indeed difficult to implement, but the key still depends on whether the ecosystem can keep up... Wait, has the payment scenario really been rolled out? Don’t become just another PPT project. I agree with holding the position, but is this price really the bottom? It feels like there’s still some testing of the waters. Once in ten years? Bro, that’s a bit harsh. The market always teaches overly optimistic people a lesson. The chip structure is clear and well-defined, but the actions of the big players are still hard to see through.

View OriginalReply0

BlockDetective

· 12-27 10:52

The destruction mechanism does have some substance, but the problem is, can the ecosystem really take off? Holding is holding, but I'm just worried that a black swan might come along halfway... We've been talking about expanding payment scenarios for a long time—when will it actually be implemented? Is the chip differentiation clear? I still can't understand who is accumulating and who is distributing. A once-in-ten-years event—how are the coins we talked about last time doing now... The premise of steady holding is having enough psychological resilience; not everyone can endure it.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichMaker

· 12-27 10:46

Writing the burn mechanism on-chain is a good detail; only then does true scarcity have confidence. But saying it happens once in ten years... I've heard that too many times haha. I agree on maintaining positions; frequent trading is just cutting yourself.

View OriginalReply0

ChainProspector

· 12-27 10:45

The burn mechanism is written on-chain, and the supply reduction is indeed solid. But the real test is whether the ecosystem can be implemented; talking only about payment scenarios is useless. We've heard too many times that holding positions is important. The key is whether you can withstand the next wave of corrections. Happens once every ten years? Wake up, people say that in every bull market.

View OriginalReply0

DuskSurfer

· 12-27 10:43

The destruction mechanism is indeed a highlight, but the key still depends on whether the ecosystem can truly be implemented... Impressive on paper, but practical application is the real key.

View OriginalReply0