I usually keep this trading method quite tight. It's not that I'm afraid you won't learn it, but once you master it thoroughly, you might earn even more than I do by the end of the year.



First, let's clarify the premise: small funds aiming to amplify within a short cycle rely not on precise market predictions. To put it simply, it's about rhythm and structure.

I'm not encouraging you to go all-in, nor am I suggesting mechanically copying entry points. The key is to change your perspective to understand the market and find those genuine opportunities.

What I like to monitor most are the quietest periods in the market—when there are few people, minimal noise, and the sentiment is the most subdued. Ironically, it's during these states that you can see the market's truest form. Many key capital movements happen precisely in these silent moments. Not loud or flashy, but leaving traces.

For example, sudden thinning of order books, widening spreads, or brief imbalances in related markets... These are not signals of explosive growth but indications that funds are quietly adjusting their formations. If you can recognize these, you'll know the market is starting to stir. Otherwise, you'll just think the market is dull and boring.

On the operational level, I never go all-in right away. The first step is to test the waters, to see if it's a false move. Only when emotions are clearly distorted and prices start behaving abnormally do I seriously increase my position. I profit from volatility, not from faith.

The most crucial point—always leave yourself a backup plan. The most ferocious market moves often come when everyone thinks it's over. If you run out of bullets, you'll just watch the market shake violently, unable to move a single position.

Regarding risk control, honestly, seasoned traders don't just fear single-loss trades. They're afraid of being completely washed out by the market. Stop-loss points are not copied from tutorials but are chosen where the market is most vulnerable—usually the weakest spots.

To be frank: the essence of this approach is reading capital flows, riding the rhythm, and testing patience. Only those who can stick to these basic principles have a chance to stand firm in the market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MechanicalMartelvip
· 11h ago
Basically, it's waiting for the wind to come; don't foolishly chase the rise, right?
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugeevip
· 11h ago
You sound quite confident, but everyone who has tried knows that waiting on the sidelines is much more comfortable than going all-in. I feel that the key to this strategy is mindset; most people simply can't handle the loneliness. I've also used the deep thinning trick, and it does seem to detect something, but you need to watch the market closely and spend time on it. Really, saving bullets is more important than anything else. I've seen too many people go all-in only to end up just watching the show. There are many who can't stick for a month and start mechanically going all-in; that's the real danger. What this strategy gives me is the feeling that you're not making money from the market itself, but from others' impatience.
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collectorvip
· 11h ago
Sounds good, but how many people truly master the art of "riding the rhythm" after hearing it so often? --- Instead of focusing on quiet periods, why not ask yourself why you weren't as calm when you were losing money? --- It's quite ironic that people holding full positions claim to leave room for themselves. --- Fund flow traces do exist, but understanding and making money are worlds apart. --- In the end, those who survive are the ones who don't greed. --- "Reading the funds, riding the rhythm, and testing patience"—the order is reversed; it should be "test patience to survive," everything else is nonsense. --- Does widening the spread mean fund movements? To me, it looks more like liquidity drying up. --- It seems every person claiming to be consistently profitable repeats this logic. --- The core is still risk control; everything else is just gambling on probabilities. --- Why do some always think that understanding fund movements means they can make money, not realizing that big players can also get caught?
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioningvip
· 11h ago
Ah, it sounds like they're saying "Don't copy me or you'll earn more than me," I really have to admit I'm impressed by this rhetoric. Wait, testing the waters and holding back a bit does have some interesting points, but the key is still that phrase "out of bullets and just watching," which is so true. The concept of adjusting funds and reshaping the formation is fresh—buying the dip during quiet periods? Feels like it needs to be verified repeatedly.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)