#数字资产市场动态 1 billion UNI tokens were gone in one go, and the market cap shrank by nearly $600 million. The voting results showed 99.9% in favor, but what’s the outcome? The price remains the same, oscillating narrowly between $5.8 and $5.9.



From a candlestick perspective, on the four-hour chart, UNI still has upward momentum. $7 is a good target, and if it drops, $5.6 can serve as support. However, with options expiration and holiday effects happening simultaneously, the probability of a clear direction in the short term is low, and consolidation is more likely.

On the other hand, the protocol fee switch is now turned on. In the future, 5% to 10% of tokens will be bought back and burned annually through this mechanism, which sounds quite good. But there’s a practical issue—if funds don’t keep flowing in and trading activity doesn’t pick up, even the most impressive burn plan is just a numbers game and won’t have a real impact.

The core question is quite straightforward: Is this round of burning truly a reflection of the market’s confidence in the project’s value, or is it just a short-term hype-driven price pump? After the lock-up period ends on the 28th, we may see the true future direction of UNI.
UNI1,63%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 35m ago
99.9% of votes approve, but the price is still locked at 5.8? It feels like a psychological placebo; the real test will depend on whether the funds are willing to enter the market.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValuevip
· 16h ago
The coin burning scheme looks good, but in reality, it's still the same old story. Without popularity, everything is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gainsvip
· 16h ago
99.9% voted to burn tokens, but the result is still fluctuating between 5.8 and 5.9. This is outrageous, it feels like just a short-term hype tactic.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAOvip
· 16h ago
99.9% of votes agree to burn tokens, but the price remains completely unchanged. This is a classic scene of DAO governance. To put it simply, voting weight is completely disconnected from actual purchasing power; everyone votes just for the sense of participation. Capital inflow is the real key. Without trading volume to support the burn mechanism, it's just self-deception. There are too many lessons from history. Let's see the truth on the 28th. Once the lock-up period is over, the truth will be revealed.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabondvip
· 16h ago
Burning is burning, price is still price. Can these two be equated? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaservip
· 16h ago
99.9% voted in favor, and the result is still the same. Laughing out loud, a typical awkward scene of on-chain democracy. Burning coins, to put it simply, is just that no one is willing to take over. Capital inflow is the key.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 16h ago
Based on on-chain data, the destruction mechanism is essentially a psychological game—99.9% of votes agree, yet the token price remains unchanged. What does this indicate? It shows that the market doesn't really take this seriously. An annual destruction rate of 5% to 10% sounds impressive, but without real trading volume backing it up, it's ultimately just a paper story. The real test will come after the unlock on the 28th, when we may be able to see whether this is genuine confidence or just hype.
View OriginalReply0
MetaLord420vip
· 16h ago
Burned 600 million in market value with no results, this is ridiculous, it all feels like a numbers game.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)