Sharing a not-so-glamorous fact—my trading win rate isn't actually high. But over the years, my account has been steadily growing. It sounds like a paradox, but there's a method to it.
Recently, I've been frequently trading back and forth, wearing down over 200,000 dollars. It sounds terrible, but this is actually my defensive strategy. Why intentionally wear down? Because I'm afraid of a situation where I get wiped out in one big move. Once the market trend doesn't feel right, I close the position immediately. Although this approach may lead to multiple small losses, at least I won't get liquidated in extreme market conditions.
Of course, the obvious cost is that frequent trading erodes profits. If no clear trend emerges later, those gains from winning trades can't cover the accumulated wear and tear, resulting in significant losses. This strategy works for me, but most people can't learn it or maintain the mindset of losing a few times and still opening new positions.
However, after experiencing a major crash, you realize the value of wear and tear. Those extreme market conditions made me completely give up on full-position gambling. Now, I prefer small frequent losses rather than risking everything to zero. Once, I even saw a drawdown from the peak of 60-70%. The simple approach I developed is—when there's a large unrealized profit, take half off.
Key observation: As long as a coin moves independently and forms a trend, bullish divergence will begin. For large-cap coins with sufficient trading volume, such trends usually don't end quickly; they go through a process of topping out and distribution. During wear and tear, as long as I don't open reckless trades, when the trend truly unfolds, profits will explode rapidly. Most people's big money is actually made during trending markets.
For example, the recent ZEC movement is very typical—bullish divergence is very obvious, with a rise of dozens of times, which is a strong trend indicator. Even after dropping from over $700 to around $300, it still rebounds and forms a top. I initially wanted to buy around the MA120 moving average (about $230), but didn't catch the bottom. However, several moving averages below are supporting, so the probability of going to zero is low.
Final tip: Don't overly rely on any technical analysis or indicators; always be mentally prepared for a coin to go to zero. I have no faith in any coin—once I make a profit, I take it out, and I never recharge. If the market crashes to zero, I don't mind.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentPhobia
· 13h ago
Wear and tear turn into explosions; it sounds easy, but in reality, it's really hard to hold on. I've tried a few times and my mentality collapsed.
That's so true. Building a zeroing mindset is the real defense line, more effective than any moving average.
I need to think carefully about this idea. I feel like I'm constantly testing the edge of self-destruction.
Random trading is really a dead end. Recently, I lost the most because of this issue.
ZEC has been fierce this wave, but I feel like it hasn't topped out yet. What do you think about the upcoming resistance levels?
Taking half out was brilliant. Why didn't I hear about it earlier?
Ordinary people’s big gains are indeed given by trends. But I insist on fighting in the volatility.
Losing 70% from the peak and still managing to come out alive—that's impressive mental resilience.
Don't blindly trust indicators, I agree. But the problem is, not looking at indicators is even more frightening.
Frequent wear and tear may seem like earning small money, but actually, it's making room for the big trend. This logic is interesting.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMiner
· 13h ago
Even with a low win rate, you can still make money—that's real skill. That's also my approach, but it's easy to get mentally overwhelmed.
Losing over 200,000 sounds harsh, but honestly, it's much better than being wiped out in a single all-in. Those shouting for full positions are gambling mentality.
The most frightening moments are those confident times when you think this wave is safe, but it results in a direct margin call. You still need to take half of the unrealized gains and run, living is more important than making money.
You're right, the trend is the king. Wait until the trend is established before entering, don't bother with those messy indicators.
I was also watching that ZEC move, but really, no one can predict when it will go to zero. We still need to respect the market.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetective
· 13h ago
This guy's worn-out strategy sounds hardcore, but I have to say, most people can't withstand a few small losses and will blow up their mentality... The real logic of making money is waiting for the trend, not repeatedly fighting in the turbulence.
The cost of frequently closing positions worth over 200,000 can buy a no-liquidation win, which might be worth it in this trade, but the premise is that you can really tell when to hold on and when to run. This thing sounds simple but is hard to do.
I also followed the ZEC wave, but bro, you said someone dared to buy in when it dropped from 700 to 300... I think psychological preparation is one thing, but when it comes to critical moments, it still depends on reaction speed and luck. Anyway, I can't learn this level.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollector
· 13h ago
Basically, coming back alive is the most important thing; everything else is虚的.
Not afraid of earning少了, but afraid of going all in and getting out directly.
This is true enlightenment; most people are still dreaming of a turnaround.
There's nothing shameful about磨损; only by surviving can you earn the next wave.
Frequent stop-losses may sound painful, but compared to爆仓, it's like saving your life.
ZEC this wave is indeed绝, but I still think it's too容易被套.
What's wrong with低胜率? Surviving and coming out is already winning half.
This logic is correct, but坚持太难了; most people can't endure the磨损期.
提一半 this move is绝; it防暴跌 and won't lead to后悔.
Honestly, those who dare to频繁止损 already超过90%的散户.
Sharing a not-so-glamorous fact—my trading win rate isn't actually high. But over the years, my account has been steadily growing. It sounds like a paradox, but there's a method to it.
Recently, I've been frequently trading back and forth, wearing down over 200,000 dollars. It sounds terrible, but this is actually my defensive strategy. Why intentionally wear down? Because I'm afraid of a situation where I get wiped out in one big move. Once the market trend doesn't feel right, I close the position immediately. Although this approach may lead to multiple small losses, at least I won't get liquidated in extreme market conditions.
Of course, the obvious cost is that frequent trading erodes profits. If no clear trend emerges later, those gains from winning trades can't cover the accumulated wear and tear, resulting in significant losses. This strategy works for me, but most people can't learn it or maintain the mindset of losing a few times and still opening new positions.
However, after experiencing a major crash, you realize the value of wear and tear. Those extreme market conditions made me completely give up on full-position gambling. Now, I prefer small frequent losses rather than risking everything to zero. Once, I even saw a drawdown from the peak of 60-70%. The simple approach I developed is—when there's a large unrealized profit, take half off.
Key observation: As long as a coin moves independently and forms a trend, bullish divergence will begin. For large-cap coins with sufficient trading volume, such trends usually don't end quickly; they go through a process of topping out and distribution. During wear and tear, as long as I don't open reckless trades, when the trend truly unfolds, profits will explode rapidly. Most people's big money is actually made during trending markets.
For example, the recent ZEC movement is very typical—bullish divergence is very obvious, with a rise of dozens of times, which is a strong trend indicator. Even after dropping from over $700 to around $300, it still rebounds and forms a top. I initially wanted to buy around the MA120 moving average (about $230), but didn't catch the bottom. However, several moving averages below are supporting, so the probability of going to zero is low.
Final tip: Don't overly rely on any technical analysis or indicators; always be mentally prepared for a coin to go to zero. I have no faith in any coin—once I make a profit, I take it out, and I never recharge. If the market crashes to zero, I don't mind.