Look, managing collaboration for ten communities simultaneously just doesn't add up. I get it—helping out buddies is important, but let's be real here. You can't genuinely represent that many groups at once without cutting corners somewhere. It's not a matter of possibility; it's a question of integrity. If you really want to support your community friends, pick a few you can actually commit to properly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BugBountyHunter
· 19h ago
Managing ten communities at the same time? Buddy, that's just self-deception.
View OriginalReply0
HodlAndChill
· 19h ago
Honestly, trying to manage ten communities at once is self-deception. If you can't do it, don't force it.
View OriginalReply0
GweiObserver
· 19h ago
NGL, ten communities at the same time? That means none of them will do well. Instead of spreading thin, it's better to focus on a few and do them well.
Look, managing collaboration for ten communities simultaneously just doesn't add up. I get it—helping out buddies is important, but let's be real here. You can't genuinely represent that many groups at once without cutting corners somewhere. It's not a matter of possibility; it's a question of integrity. If you really want to support your community friends, pick a few you can actually commit to properly.