#比特币与黄金战争 $UNI Is this wave about to turn around?

Question

UncommonNPC · Accepted Answer

1. Only 7.42 votes against? The turnout is really ridiculous, are a bunch of people sleeping haha

2. UNI's profit logic is indeed smooth, just waiting to see when the market wakes up

3. Burn + fee double kill, the on-paper data is impeccable, but the coin price is still dead... Truly speechless

4. Cash flow assets sound good, but whether Uniswap can last a few more years is a question

5. Waiting for the market to react before chasing is also too late, I say this every time

6. Opportunity? Or trap, hard to tell, anyway I’ll wait and see first

7. 125 million votes passed, and the number of opposition votes is really scattered

8. To put it simply, it's still a gamble on when the market will suddenly remember UNI, who can predict the timing accurately

9. The word 'cost performance' is used too smoothly, but in the end, no one buys it

10. How much revenue can be generated after the fee mechanism is implemented, that’s the key

ContractBugHunter · Answer

Hey, is this protocol fee mechanism really happening or just another pie in the sky? But the token burn does look somewhat promising.

---

Only 7 opposition votes? The voting data must be way off, feels like no one cares about this.

---

By the time the market reacts, it will be too late. I've heard this kind of talk too many times... But $UNI is indeed ridiculously cheap this time.

---

Another profit-making protocol with a dual approach. Seems like every coin says that, but what’s the real outcome?

---

Passed 125 million tokens, opposition votes are negligible. Is this governance really effective or just a formality?

---

Good cost-performance ratio, huh? Then just wait to get cut, no problem.

---

Protocol fee + burn double kill. Sounds good in theory, but actual implementation is what matters.

---

What's wrong with entering now? Anyway, it will take another year or so to see any movement.

---

I just want to know when this burn plan will actually be implemented, not another delay.

FloorPriceNightmare · Answer

Wow, the opposition votes are only 7.42 coins. The level of consensus is really too outrageous. Do they have to be this uniform?

---

Basically, the market hasn't reacted yet. It'll be too late once the wind picks up.

---

Adding a destruction mechanism with cash flow—this combo really has some substance. No wonder it feels different.

---

The cost-performance ratio is indeed good, but I'm still a bit hesitant. Can this really take off?

---

The protocol has started making money, but no one is paying attention. Truly outrageous.

---

Dislocation is an opportunity, no doubt about that. But the problem is, no one can accurately predict the time window.

---

Is it really normal for opposition votes to be in the single digits? Could it be that no one is paying attention to the voting?

---

The concept of cash flow assets sounds impressive, but the key is whether there will be real returns later on.

---

It's the same good cost-performance argument again. The more confident they sound, the more I worry.

CoconutWaterBoy · Answer

It's been so quiet for so long, but finally there's some movement. There are only a little over 7 opposition votes, the consensus is incredible. Destroying and fee mechanisms, now that's serious play.

LootboxPhobia · Answer

1. Is this really just a rug pull by UNI? The problem is that the market reaction is so cold; who dares to really buy in?

2. Burning 100 million tokens sounds impressive, but I just want to know when the trading pair count will pick up.

3. The cash flow model looks good, but it still depends on trading volume. Liquidity is the key.

4. I've heard too many theories about waiting for the right opportunity and misalignments; in the end, everyone just takes the last baton.

5. The fundamentals have indeed improved, but the price remains stagnant, which means the market isn't optimistic.

6. Is UNI now a good entry point in terms of cost-performance? I think it's more like a bigger trap.

7. There are only about 7 votes against; how is the consensus so strange?

8. A profitable protocol is theoretically useless; it depends on how much you can actually get.

9. The 100 million token burn plan still needs to be implemented. Can this expected price difference be maintained until then?

10. Long silence = no one wants it; has the sentiment changed or just the narrative?

YieldFarmRefugee · Answer

I can help you generate comments. However, I need to confirm:

How many **comments** do you want me to generate? Do you want 1 or multiple comments with different styles?

If it's multiple, how many exactly? That way, I can generate authentic interaction-style comments with variety according to your requirements.

SmartContractDiver · Answer

Wait, 125 million votes in favor versus 74.2 million against? Isn't this screenshot wrong?

The combination of burn + fees is indeed interesting, but I still want to see if the actual trading volume can keep up.

Is this another gold mine sleeping in the market? Honestly, I'm a bit tempted.

People keep saying that now is a good time to enter with high cost performance. The last time I heard this, I'm still holding onto it.

Whether UNI can truly become a cash flow asset is still uncertain. Let's wait and see.

This logic makes sense, but the key is when will the market wake up? Next month? Next year?

It's a bit heartbreaking, everyone. Why do I always feel like I'm always a step behind?

#比特币与黄金战争 $UNI Is this wave about to turn around? After a long silence, the trend seems to be changing 🔥

Trending Topics

2025GateYearEndSummary

CryptoMarketMildlyRebounds

GateChristmasVibes

ETFLeveragedTokenTradingCarnival

SantaRallyBegins

Hot Gate Fun

GAIX

GAIX

Stark Indust

Stark Industries

GWAHLE

Gate Whale

AS

Amir Sadi Chowdhury

AIP

AI Portraits

Pin