This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullSurvivor
· 21h ago
Here we go again, just locking in the position? I think it's good, but I'm worried it might just be empty promises again.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegret
· 12-27 09:10
Locked reserve schemes I've seen before, but the key is not to become just a paper promise again.
A 1% monthly buyback sounds substantial, but I'm worried it will fall apart halfway through execution.
This kind of treasury operation is indeed smarter than directly dumping the market, but what about UXLINK's previous credit limit... Do you guys not have a clear understanding yourselves?
Wait, where does this profit come from? Is the project really making money or just squeezing toothpaste?
I just want to see if December will really start to move or if it will be silent again after the community vote.
Actually, this approach isn't bad; it all depends on whether the team is truly committed to long-term operation.
Let's keep observing, after all, promises are easy, but execution is difficult.
View OriginalReply0
TokenCreatorOP
· 12-27 09:10
Damn, finally a project dares to buy back, unlike some who just talk trash every day
---
1% monthly, gotta stick with it, don’t make empty promises like PPT
---
I like the lock-up vault strategy, much more reliable than just dumping the market
---
Sounds good, let’s see how December’s execution goes, judge by actions not words
---
Interesting, but this kind of plan really tests the team’s resolve
---
This operation is like buying insurance for yourself, smart move
---
Don’t do fake stuff, real buybacks with actual money are more convincing
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercoder
· 12-27 09:07
Sounds good, but the key is how long it can be sustained
1% monthly buyback lock-up, this operation is indeed quite interesting
Both buyback and reserve, let's wait and see how this combination performs
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayer
· 12-27 09:04
It looks like a vault game, but only those who can truly hold on count.
It sounds good, but I'm afraid that after December, there will be all kinds of reasons to delay again.
This operation is indeed pretty good, much smarter than just dumping the market.
If you ask me, the key is whether the team genuinely wants to do long-term.
A 1% monthly buyback sounds stable, but with such a large supply, can we really see the effect?
How many times have we been promised this... how many months can they stick to it this time?
It's somewhat interesting, at least it's not a misleading proposal.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 12-27 08:57
Monthly buyback lock-up, this round is really something, much better than just dumping.
It's another "commitment to execution" story, let's see the results in December.
A 1% buyback ratio sounds a bit too cautious.
AAVE has already played the strategic reserve game, the key is whether the team has patience.
Honestly, locking up tokens is more honest than the liquidity mining schemes that cut leeks.
How long can this routine last? I bet they'll relax the execution in three months.
It seems like it's meant to fight inflation, but the direction is correct.
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 12-27 08:40
Locking in positions without crashing the market is indeed clever, but I'm worried that later it might just be empty talk.
UXLINK社区通过回购提案,12月启动月度回购与战略储备计划
【币界】UXLINK社区最近投票通过了一个有意思的提案——回购加战略储备计划。这不是什么新概念,但执行力度很关键。
按计划,UXLINK从12月起就要动真格了。每个月拿出项目利润来回购代币,比例不少于总供应量的1%。听起来稳定吧?关键是这些回购的UXLINK不是砸进市场,而是全部锁进战略储备金库。
这招其实蛮精的——既能持续释放利好信号支持市场信心,又能逐步建立起项目的"金库"。长期来看,这种操作方式有利于UXLINK生态的健康发展。当然,真正能否见效,还得看后续执行的坚定性。