The phenomenon of liquidation in the contract market is shocking, but have you ever wondered why so many people continue to rush forward?



The problem has never been platform design, but rather the traders' own misunderstanding of the rules.

It seems like 5x leverage, but in practice, it's a completely different story. An account with $10,000 in funds opening positions of $30,000 or $50,000—on the surface, following the rules, but in reality, playing with dozens of times the leverage. This self-deceiving position sizing will eventually pay the price for greed. The root cause of liquidation lies here.

How do truly knowledgeable traders operate? They treat contracts as serious risk battles, not as ATMs. They spend 70% of their time waiting—not idly, but analyzing. When the market is unclear, they can sit tight even with no positions—this discipline itself is a form of competitiveness.

Once they decide to act, their logic must be meticulous, and their entries must be precise. Every profit they make essentially comes from the principal of those who are liquidated on the other side of the market. Recognizing this is key to understanding that this is not a zero-sum game illusion.

Regarding the balance between stop-loss and profit: a single loss exceeding 5% of the account must trigger a stop-loss, preventing repeated mistakes. But when the direction is confirmed and the logic is sound, the profit target should be at least 2-3 times the risk; otherwise, trading fees will eat up most of the gains.

Those traders who constantly mess around in the market are often worn down by trading fees—frequent entries and exits, emotional trading, staying up late to operate. It may seem like trading, but in reality, they are just contributing fees to the platform.

To survive in contracts, there are only two words: go against human nature. Stay calm when others panic, hit the brakes when others get overexcited. This is not about cultivation; it’s a survival rule.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MintMastervip
· 12-27 08:50
That hits too close to home. The ones around me who shout signals every day haven't even made a fraction of my account and are already going all-in...
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchormanvip
· 12-27 08:48
It really just comes down to mindset. People dare to turn 10x leverage into 50x leverage—it's asking for trouble. It's a good point about going against human nature, but 90% of people simply can't do it, including myself.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiacvip
· 12-27 08:41
That's right, this essentially is a failure of mechanism design. The platform sets the rules, and traders end up sabotaging themselves—I've seen this logic too many times in DAO governance. No matter how perfect the rules are, if the incentives at the execution level are misaligned, everything falls apart. However, the truly painful point is this: those who frequently cut losses actually haven't established a long-term game framework at all, and are always reacting passively. In other words, they lack the ability to govern themselves. This is the same root cause as the low proposal approval rate—both are driven by short-term greed overshadowing long-term interests. A 5% stop-loss threshold sounds safe, but the problem is how many people can actually stick to it? Isn't this a classic dilemma of incentive compatibility—rational choices and actual behavior always have a gap.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStakervip
· 12-27 08:39
Exactly right, but most people simply can't maintain that discipline, including myself. Watching the coin prices fluctuate up and down every day, my hands get itchy, and then I make a move, and it all blows up.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersPapervip
· 12-27 08:37
That's right, but to be honest... I'm just that kind of useless person who messes around in the market every day, and I even contribute a bunch of fees, haha, huge loss. 70% waiting? I'm 70% watching the ups and downs, and the remaining 30% regretting why I didn't go all in. Against human nature? Come on, brother, my nature is greed, probably can't change it in this lifetime.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomHuntervip
· 12-27 08:27
Sounds right, but I find that most people simply can't do this. Waiting for 70% sounds easy, but in reality, only a few can stick to it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt