#美国探讨BTC作为战略资产的可行性 SUI ecosystem has recently had big movements. The news of institutions submitting ETF applications caused a clear market reaction—this is a signal of traditional finance recognizing on-chain assets. Meanwhile, ASTER has initiated a buyback and burn mechanism, with strong deflationary expectations driving the rally, and token holders' sentiment is high. Looking at the AT community, discussion activity remains high, and good news keeps coming. These three clues together showcase different growth logic. SUI follows the route of institutional recognition, ASTER relies on deflation support, and AT depends on community consensus. Which path is more stable ultimately depends on how far each can go. Want to have an in-depth chat?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NftBankruptcyClub
· 4h ago
Let's not get too excited about the ETF passing, history tells us that institutional entry is often a top signal
ASTER's deflationary gameplay is indeed sassy, but who doesn't know how long the destruction can last?
Community consensus is the most weak, and once the popularity is over, nothing is gone, I don't think so
All three roads are gambling for me, so it's better to go directly to the spot in Stud's hand
The system recognizes that ≠ really rises, how cautious we are if SUI relies on this pull
I am convinced by the popularity of the AT community, but I am afraid that the good news will be eaten up in advance
Again, looking at the fundamentals is much more down-to-earth than looking at the face of the institution
View OriginalReply0
fren_with_benefits
· 9h ago
SUI's ETF application is indeed aggressive, but I still favor ASTER's deflationary logic more.
---
With such high community enthusiasm, could it just be hype? Few projects can truly land.
---
Institutional approval sounds impressive, but actual implementation is the real key.
---
The deflation mechanism is really satisfying, directly cutting from the supply side.
---
These three projects have completely different logic; it seems impossible to compare them directly...
---
SUI has the strongest institutional backing, but deflationary tokens are easier to pump.
---
Community consensus is fragile; cash flow and mechanisms are more reliable.
---
ASTER's buyback and burn strategy is slick; will the price drop once it's no longer in play?
---
Everyone wants to make money, everyone claims to be the most stable—let's wait and see who crashes first.
---
BTC as a strategic asset is the real deal; other projects are just supporting roles.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFatigue
· 12-27 08:54
SUI's ETF application this time is indeed aggressive, but I still think deflation is a more direct approach ASTER
Community consensus is too虚 (vague/illusory); it needs real support
BTC as a strategic asset? Okay, but what about these small coins
If the SUI ETF passes, it might actually cause a sell-off; institutions come in just to harvest profits
ASTER's destruction mechanism, forget it; historically, these kinds of schemes always stop after a while
Still, focus on fundamentals, don't just listen to stories
All three clues are not stable enough; better to hold coins and wait for the Bitcoin ecosystem
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuru
· 12-27 08:48
Really, does the ETF application for SUI mean approval? From what I see, this wave is more about speculation expectations. Let's wait until it's actually approved.
---
ASTER's deflation mechanism sounds good, but how long can the destruction last? The biggest concern is the lack of new narratives later on.
---
Compared to three paths, community consensus is still the most fragile; it can disperse with a gust of wind.
---
Institutional recognition is the most reliable, but the timing for SUI is a bit delicate...
---
Honestly, I'm a bit tired of the deflation approach. I've seen too many flash-in-the-pan projects last year.
---
High popularity in the AT community isn't necessarily a good thing; sometimes it's just about taking over the leftovers.
---
Instead of worrying about which path is more stable, it's better to see whose fundamentals are stronger.
---
Regulatory approval sounds impressive, but the key is whether it can be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrying
· 12-27 08:43
The ETF route for SUI is indeed attractive, but don't forget that ASTER's wave of deflation is the real fundamental support.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 12-27 08:38
SUI's roadmap is the most stable, institutional recognition is different, that deflationary model of ASTER will eventually kill itself.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsCriminal
· 12-27 08:29
Another wave of "This time it's different" is coming, haha. I bet five bucks I'll be proven wrong next week.
#美国探讨BTC作为战略资产的可行性 SUI ecosystem has recently had big movements. The news of institutions submitting ETF applications caused a clear market reaction—this is a signal of traditional finance recognizing on-chain assets. Meanwhile, ASTER has initiated a buyback and burn mechanism, with strong deflationary expectations driving the rally, and token holders' sentiment is high. Looking at the AT community, discussion activity remains high, and good news keeps coming. These three clues together showcase different growth logic. SUI follows the route of institutional recognition, ASTER relies on deflation support, and AT depends on community consensus. Which path is more stable ultimately depends on how far each can go. Want to have an in-depth chat?