2025-12-27 08:24:08

Recently, there has been a lot of discussion about a question—does a project really need to target casual users? My straightforward opinion is: good projects don't need to worry about this because they naturally attract two types of people. One is users with genuine needs, and the other is players seeking profits. Both are necessary, and that is the ideal state for a project to pursue.

Conversely, what kind of track products are truly needed by genuine users? This question is actually quite crucial. I think the answer is very clear—AI. This direction has been consistently popular. Recently, there have been many innovative products doing well in this track, such as AI-based fortune-telling analysis and life K-line charts, which are trying to enter the market with new approaches. These products indeed hit a certain pain point for users and have attracted many participants. From this perspective, choosing the right track naturally helps form a healthy user ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ponzi_poet

· 12-27 08:53

That's right, but as for AI fortune-telling... I really don't understand how it became popular. It just seems like it's only well-packaged.

View OriginalReply0

SmartMoneyWallet

· 12-27 08:53

The issues of the "撸毛" users are not worth discussing at all. Just look at the on-chain data; the distribution of chips in truly good projects has already explained everything. Currently, AI is the area where funds are concentrated, and it depends on who can survive the inflow and outflow of whales.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 12-27 08:50

nah the farmer/genuine user dichotomy is just surface level pattern matching... real question is what's the *actual* transaction velocity distribution telling us about project health. those "innovation" ai products tho lol... feels like watching wallet clustering around hype rather than genuine accumulation phases. statistically speaking most won't survive the noise.

Reply0

ApeWithNoChain

· 12-27 08:47

Honestly, good projects don't need to argue over this trivial issue. Attracting genuine users and arbitrageurs is the real key. AI has definitely never cooled off; applications like candlestick charts are quite interesting, but it's uncertain how long they can last. If the track is right, the ecosystem will naturally grow, there's no doubt about that. Real demand is the core; grabbing small profits is just an optional side activity.

View OriginalReply0

notSatoshi1971

· 12-27 08:45

Good projects are not afraid of being exploited; really, it's only their own products that might have issues. AI is indeed popular right now, but AI fortune-telling analysis... that's a bit far-fetched, haha. If the track is right, you can lie back and win? I don't think so; execution is the key.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoFear

· 12-27 08:35

A truly good project doesn't need to worry about grabbing profits; it can attract people on its own. I'm optimistic about AI. The combination of fortune-telling and K-line charts is indeed interesting and hits the right nerve. To put it simply, choosing the right track is the key, and the ecosystem will naturally develop.

View OriginalReply0