2025-12-27 08:22:51

From an investment perspective, this project seems to be doing something that is easily overlooked by the market but extremely necessary — truly integrating compliance and trading efficiency, two concepts that are usually at odds, on the blockchain.

Currently, many Web3 projects are chasing new narratives or new token models, but the real pain point is not a lack of creativity, rather the inability of institutions and large funds to enter. On-chain assets, cross-border payments, institutional clearing — these seemingly simple needs involve complex issues such as security, regulatory compliance, and counterparty risk management. Some platforms are decentralized but have chaotic governance; others are centralized but struggle to achieve true transparency.

This direction is different — it directly addresses the fundamental question of "Will money dare to come in?"

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

blocksnark

· 20h ago

Compliance + efficiency is really a false dilemma; it's well-written but difficult to implement in practice. Whether money comes in or not still depends on regulatory approval; no matter how innovative we get, it's all in vain. Another project claiming to be revolutionary, but in the end, compromises are still necessary. This is what the crypto world needs, not just another round of new concepts to harvest retail investors. The wall of institutional funds has indeed never been truly broken down; the slogans are loud and clear. Looks good, but how to make money?

View OriginalReply0

NewDAOdreamer

· 22h ago

To be honest, compliance is really a major concern for big funds. Don't bother with new concepts; getting this right is more important than anything else. Institutional money is really timid; you need to give them a sense of security. I believe in this approach. Decentralized governance is chaotic, centralized systems are opaque, and being caught in the middle is the hardest... If this project can truly balance these aspects, it would be amazing. Whether money flows in or not depends on this key point, and you're right. Someone should have done this a long time ago. It feels like the market has been just self-indulging and hasn't addressed the core issues.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 12-27 08:47

Hmm... You're right. The projects that can truly survive are of this kind. It's not that they have many tricks, but that they can make institutional investors feel confident to pour in money.

View OriginalReply0

DegenApeSurfer

· 12-27 08:46

You're not wrong; the real bottleneck is that large funds can't get past this threshold. What's the use of daily narratives? Wait, can this thing really solve counterparty risk? Feels easy to say but hard to implement. Institutional clearing is indeed a pain point, but I bet five bucks this project will also be tangled up by regulators. Combining compliance and efficiency? Sounds a bit too good to be true. I'd rather see how it actually performs in practice.

View OriginalReply0

Web3ExplorerLin

· 12-27 08:44

hypothesis: compliance + efficiency being unified on-chain is basically solving the ancient silk road problem but for capital... the real bottleneck was never innovation, it's always been "will the institutions actually show up" lmao

Reply0

CafeMinor

· 12-27 08:43

To be honest, this is the real bottleneck. Major institutions are just waiting for something like this. Compliance plus efficiency? Sounds simple, but no one has really managed to pull it off. If institutional funds can't come in, don't talk about application implementation; it's all just pie in the sky.

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySurvivor

· 12-27 08:30

Compliance + efficiency is indeed hitting the pain points, much more than those projects that talk about narratives every day. Large capital inflows ultimately come down to trust issues, and this point is well taken.

View OriginalReply0