2025-12-27 08:22:18

In the wave of the crypto market's淘沙, I discovered a phenomenon: most people's losses are not due to choosing the wrong coins, but because they are emotionally hijacked. Fear, greed, FOMO—these three things turn even the best opportunities into gambling.

Since 2017, when I started with a $5,000 account, I have kept the maximum drawdown within 8%. This is not luck, but the implementation of a set of probabilistic rules—simply put, letting mathematics make decisions for you.

**The first game-changing move: Immediate profit layering**

Whenever a single trade reaches 10% of the principal, my habit is to lock 50% into a cold wallet. The remaining profit is used to continue rolling. It sounds conservative, but what is the effect? The principal is always there, just giving back profits during a downturn, and accelerating growth through compound interest during an uptrend. The mindset is completely different.

**Second step: Multi-cycle hedging to profit from volatility**

Simultaneously place two orders on the daily trend—one chasing breakouts, the other counter-lying. Both have stop-losses set within 1.5%. What’s the result? During sideways consolidation, both sides may be hit; once a trend forms, one side cuts losses, and the other can take significant profits, keeping the overall account in positive territory.

**Third iron law: Small bets for trial and long-term victory**

Each stop-loss is no more than 1.5% of the principal. Rather than seeing it as a loss, it’s a necessary cost to participate in the market. My win rate isn’t very high, less than 40%, but by using a high reward-to-risk ratio, I compensate and achieve stable positive returns.

There are three more disciplines to strictly follow: no single trade exceeds 10% of total funds, stop trading immediately after two consecutive losses, and periodically withdraw profits to convert into stable assets.

The key transformation is here: stop predicting, start responding. When you no longer strain to guess the next move of the market, but instead respond flexibly according to rules, anxiety naturally diminishes. Only then does your trading system truly work for you.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlashLoanLarry

· 22h ago

Although it sounds conservative, a 8% retracement suppression is truly profitable... Much more comfortable than those brothers dreaming of getting rich overnight. Setting a 1.5% stop loss is indeed tough, but this is probably the strategy that lasts the longest in the game. Low win rate is okay as long as the risk-reward ratio holds up. I need to try locking profits with a cold wallet; I always feel like my profits are in the account and I want to cut them at any time... Hedging both sides, I feel like I'm fighting myself, but sideways trading can indeed earn from both ends and has some benefits. The key is to kill off that emotional stuff. Once the rules are running smoothly, anxiety naturally disappears. I'm just worried about failing that human nature test.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractRebel

· 12-27 08:51

It sounds like a pretty good system, but what I care more about is… can it really be sustained? Most people forget after reading it This set is explained like a textbook. The real test is whether you can withstand the psychological pressure of a unilateral plunge during actual operation I’ve tried the 50% lock cold wallet trick, it really helps you sleep well, but the regret of missing out on doubling the market is also real A 1.5% stop-loss setting… sounds conservative, but during actual operation, you can hit several stop-losses in a single cycle, and the feeling of your account being slowly eroded—do you want that? So the question is, did your set of rules really get you through the 0917 crash unscathed?

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy_Group

· 12-27 08:49

Oh, it's another story of "I went from 5000U to XXX," and I'm getting calluses on my ears from hearing it so often. But this guy's point is interesting; locking in profits in layers really shows some skill. Much more reliable than those crazy people going all-in with their entire position. A 1.5% stop-loss—such discipline is really impressive. I can't do that myself; I always want to take a gamble.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketGardener

· 12-27 08:46

Forget it, I'll just keep farming vegetables. This set of theories is giving me a headache. Stop-loss 1.5%, profit layering, multi-cycle hedging... sounds perfect, but it requires such strong self-discipline to execute. Just thinking about it makes me tired. The key is, with only a 40% win rate, can you still make money? The risk-reward ratio must be ridiculously skewed. But on the other hand, relying on mathematics for decision-making is correct; emotions are indeed the killer. I previously lost everything because of FOMO.

View OriginalReply0

MEVVictimAlliance

· 12-27 08:46

Damn, this mathematical model is indeed very tight, but you say that a 40% win rate can still achieve stable profits—I believe it. The key really lies in that risk-reward ratio.

View OriginalReply0

fren.eth

· 12-27 08:39

Damn, I figured out this logic last year, but the hardest part is the mindset. Stop loss, stop loss, stop loss—it's easy to say but really deadly to implement. But to be fair, an 8% drawdown is indeed a bit outrageous. Is it because the capital is too small and therefore easier to control? Or did I misunderstand something? I really support this immediate tiered profit approach; at least I can sleep peacefully. It's basically using discipline to exchange for anxiety levels, which is worth it. The hedging idea for two orders is good, but the transaction fees are a bit painful. The key is to find a system that belongs to you; otherwise, no matter how many experts' methods you follow, it's all in vain.

View OriginalReply0