2025-12-27 08:21:20

That Vibe Coding tutorial finally reached 1.3 million views, but the private messages were all full of doubts—saying I bought traffic and that it was all fake. Actually, you guys are overthinking it. Someone even asked if I have a big boss supporting me behind the scenes, joking that a certain tech tycoon is helping me operate. Haha, not at all.

To be honest, I should be one of the earliest in the crypto circle to discover this wave of traffic mechanism changes and share it with a few like-minded friends. It’s nothing mysterious; I just seized some window periods of the platform’s algorithm and maximized the content’s value. It’s not that complicated, just an information gap.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProveMyZK

· 19h ago

The term "algorithm window period" is well said, it’s the difference between those who understand the industry and those who don’t. The more you explain the traffic anxiety, the more it seems guilty; your attitude is actually refreshing. Information asymmetry is always the simplest and most brutal logic for making money. What’s there to hide? A view count of 1.3 million can indeed attract a bunch of lemon spirits, but it has nothing to do with whether you buy traffic or not. The worst are those mysterious and secretive types; being honest like this makes people trust you more.

View OriginalReply0

LowCapGemHunter

· 19h ago

The term "information gap" is used too casually, but it's truly outrageous not to buy views with 1.3 million plays. However, there's no need to hide it, right?

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichVictim

· 19h ago

The term "algorithm window period" sounds quite comfortable, and information gap players indeed profit from it.

View OriginalReply0

RetiredMiner

· 19h ago

Brothers, it's all about catching the rhythm. There's nothing mysterious, just an information gap. Basically, it's about seeing this mechanism earlier than others. While others are still exploring, you've already moved ahead. 130 million in traffic is indeed impressive, but it's understandable why so many people question it. After all, this circle is full of magical things. The most annoying are those who insist on labeling it as the work of a "big shot behind the scenes." That's really overthinking. Algorithm window periods are just about discovering early. There's no real skill involved; it all depends on who reacts faster. By the way, do people still ask about your tutorial now, or has the hype died down? Actually, this is the normal state of Web3. Those who can circulate information quickly always have an advantage. But to be honest, you should take this opportunity to write a review and clarify your methodology. It looks like understanding the platform, manipulating the algorithm, is simple and straightforward but effective.

View OriginalReply0

memecoin_therapy

· 19h ago

Information asymmetry has been shattered; this is the usual operation in Web3.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWatcher

· 19h ago

Well... to be honest, I trust you, but I do feel a bit envious of the window period's intuition.

View OriginalReply0

HappyMinerUncle

· 19h ago

Information asymmetry is about those who understand making money, while those who don't guess blindly. I believe in this wave of algorithm window periods, after all, platform rules are just like this, whoever gets it first wins. Haha, really no big shots? Then that's even more impressive, relying purely on intuition. 130 million traffic is indeed top-notch, but this is the norm in Web3; when hot topics come, it's all like this. Early birds eat worms, late birds eat grains, it's that simple. People catching the wind will always be questioned, which is normal, no need to explain too much. Honestly, information asymmetry is the biggest gold mine in the crypto circle.

View OriginalReply0