When institutional power grows unchecked, so does the potential for corruption. It's a pattern we've seen repeat throughout history—and it's precisely why our system was built with constraints in the first place. Yet somewhere along the way, especially from the 1930s onward, those checks and balances got sidelined. The crypto movement didn't emerge in a vacuum. It's a response to exactly this: centralized power, unchecked authority, eroding trust. Maybe it's time we remembered what limited, accountable systems actually look like.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CexIsBad
· 12-27 08:50
ngl That blow in the 1930s was too painful, and now it’s all messed up.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTears
· 12-27 08:49
Nah fr, once power is lost, it can never be regained. That's why we have to rely on on-chain assets.
View OriginalReply0
SerumDegen
· 12-27 08:49
nah this is just copium for why we're all here tbh. the whole "checks and balances" thing got liquidated ages ago, we just finally noticed the cascade on chain. institutional corruption isn't a bug it's literally the feature—been shorting faith in centralized systems since 2008 lol
Reply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 12-27 08:47
The loss of control after 1930 was indeed incredible. Isn't crypto all about flipping the table?
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 12-27 08:46
BTC has long seen through this set; checks and balances of power are the fundamental.
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHero
· 12-27 08:44
After the 1930s, the system of checks and balances was gone. No wonder everyone is rushing into crypto now; ultimately, it's about distrust.
View OriginalReply0
LostBetweenChains
· 12-27 08:29
There's nothing wrong with that; the issue of checks and balances of power has always been a longstanding challenge. The emergence of crypto is not at all a black swan event; it's simply a rebound driven by necessity.
When institutional power grows unchecked, so does the potential for corruption. It's a pattern we've seen repeat throughout history—and it's precisely why our system was built with constraints in the first place. Yet somewhere along the way, especially from the 1930s onward, those checks and balances got sidelined. The crypto movement didn't emerge in a vacuum. It's a response to exactly this: centralized power, unchecked authority, eroding trust. Maybe it's time we remembered what limited, accountable systems actually look like.