Imagine holding a diamond just mined from a South African mine, dust still on it, and you want to record its ownership directly into your mobile digital wallet. A few years ago, that sounded absurd, but now in 2025, such things happen every day in the Web3 world. During the entire transition from carbon-based to silicon-based life, APRO plays a role like a time machine—enabling two worlds to truly communicate.

From another perspective: if blockchain is seen as an always-on supercomputer, then APRO is the precise interface that can perfectly translate real-world hardware instructions into on-chain code. It sounds grand, but the problem is actually very specific.

We’ve all seen this phenomenon. You transfer tens of millions of dollars worth of BTC or ETH on-chain in a few seconds. But how do you prove you really own an office building, a ton of gold, or a container of goods sailing across the Atlantic? Blockchain is at a loss here. This is the real-life portrayal of the famous "oracle dilemma" in the RWA (Real-World Asset) field—the assets in the real world are fluid, variable, and fuzzy, but the instructions on the chain are rigid, absolute, and cold.

Why do so many believe that APRO is currently the only channel capable of bridging these two worlds? The key isn’t in transferring assets, but in simultaneous translation of states.

Compare this with traditional RWA protocols. They are essentially like issuing vouchers—you deposit gold into a vault, and the institution issues a receipt on-chain. This logic is fundamentally a form of IOU finance, with all risks borne by the intermediary. But this is not true on-chain ownership.